Cool. I look forward to having approved 1.0.0 releases of contrib
libraries.
On May 9, 3:28 pm, Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Armando Blancas
>
> wrote:
> > Having no clue what to make of 0.0.1 precisely w.r.t. its previous
> > versions numbers, I gathered it's because y
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Armando Blancas
wrote:
> Having no clue what to make of 0.0.1 precisely w.r.t. its previous
> versions numbers, I gathered it's because you can't make out anybody's
> modules anyway, in which I agree.
Well, the previous modules didn't really have version numbers
in
Having no clue what to make of 0.0.1 precisely w.r.t. its previous
versions numbers, I gathered it's because you can't make out anybody's
modules anyway, in which I agree.
On May 9, 11:34 am, Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Armando Blancas
>
> wrote:
> > Yeap. Release numb
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Armando Blancas
wrote:
> Yeap. Release numbers have become meaningless; your point is well
> taken.
Not sure what you mean by that?
The "new contrib" libraries can be seen here, with their current,
evolving version numbers:
https://oss.sonatype.org/index.html#nex
Yeap. Release numbers have become meaningless; your point is well
taken.
On May 8, 7:11 pm, Sean Corfield wrote:
> The library formerly known as clojure.contrib.sql has had it's first
> non-snapshot release.
>
> Features added:
> * returns generated keys for single record inserts
> * supports nam
The library formerly known as clojure.contrib.sql has had it's first
non-snapshot release.
Features added:
* returns generated keys for single record inserts
* supports naming strategies to allow to override the conversion of
keywords to/from SQL entity names
* exposes resultset-seq that respect
