Having no clue what to make of 0.0.1 precisely w.r.t. its previous versions numbers, I gathered it's because you can't make out anybody's modules anyway, in which I agree.
On May 9, 11:34 am, Sean Corfield <seancorfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Armando Blancas > > <armando_blan...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Yeap. Release numbers have become meaningless; your point is well > > taken. > > Not sure what you mean by that? > > The "new contrib" libraries can be seen here, with their current, > evolving version numbers: > > https://oss.sonatype.org/index.html#nexus-search;quick~org.clojure > -- > Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN > An Architect's View --http://corfield.org/ > World Singles, LLC. --http://worldsingles.com/ > Railo Technologies, Inc. --http://www.getrailo.com/ > > "Perfection is the enemy of the good." > -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
