I can't speak for Michal, but here's my take:
Developers working on and with open source languages typically like to
use licenses compatible with the main language. When I say open
source, I mean in the sense conveyed by the OSI (found here:
http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php). When I s
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Paul Mooser wrote:
> At some point, hopefully someone will write an open-source parsing
> library with liberal licensing terms for clojure.
>
Would you mind elaborating on your definitions for the terms "open-source"
and "liberal licensing"?
I'm not sure I like
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Richard Lyman wrote:
> Currently I'm only providing the code in AOT form. If the JAR is on your
> classpath everything in the manual works just fine.
>
> Did that answer your question?
Yes, thank you!
Cheers,
mk
--
You received this message because you are subscr
At some point, hopefully someone will write an open-source parsing
library with liberal licensing terms for clojure.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new
Currently I'm only providing the code in AOT form. If the JAR is on your
classpath everything in the manual works just fine.
Did that answer your question?
-Rich
2010/1/7 Michał Kwiatkowski
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Richard Lyman
> wrote:
> > This project adds support in Clojure for
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Richard Lyman wrote:
> This project adds support in Clojure for Parsing Expression Grammars.
> You'll be able to write pseudo-ebnfs directly in your Clojure code.
Sounds nice, but where's the source code?
Cheers,
mk
--
You received this message because you are s
On Jan 5, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Richard Lyman wrote:
> For now I'd rather be compensated if someone were planning on using clj-peg
> commercially. I'm not sure how much I'd charge for a commercial-friendly
> license, and I don't have an automated process for handling billing and
> production of a d
For now I'd rather be compensated if someone were planning on using clj-peg
commercially. I'm not sure how much I'd charge for a commercial-friendly
license, and I don't have an automated process for handling billing and
production of a differently licensed product, so I'm reluctant to move that
di
Richard, can you elaborate on the license?
The license page says "Permission is granted to use and redistribute this
software except for commercial use […]"
Stefan
--
Stefan Tilkov, http://www.innoq.com/blog/st/
On 04.01.2010, at 23:27, Richard Lyman wrote:
> All,
>
> This project adds sup
I'm not familiar with Scala's parser combinators, in addition, I'm fuzzy on
the technical definition of a parser combinator.
I think I'd call it a parser combinator, since the grammar is embedded in
the code using native Clojure data structures, evaluation can be delayed,
and grammar definitions c
I forgot to appreciate having something like clg-peg to play with...
no clue where my manners went. Is this comparable at all to Scala's
parser combinators?
On Jan 5, 12:17 am, Richard Lyman wrote:
> Yeah, the management software for my site is in flux. Getting RSS done is on
> the todo list, but
Yeah, the management software for my site is in flux. Getting RSS done is on
the todo list, but not very high.
There really aren't pre-releases - when I have a version to release I
announce it here as soon as it's available. I hadn't thought that there
might actually be people interested in pre-re
An RSS feed might help early adopters test prereleases, but it's been
explicitly disabled?
On Jan 4, 5:43 pm, Richard Lyman wrote:
> Oh, sorry!
>
> I was thinking about releasing this version last week - but with the new
> year likely taking precedence I thought I'd wait.
>
> Maybe next time I'll
Oh, sorry!
I was thinking about releasing this version last week - but with the new
year likely taking precedence I thought I'd wait.
Maybe next time I'll send you a version a few days before I announce it. ;-)
-Rich
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Anniepoo wrote:
> Sweet!
>
> Wish I'd had
Sweet!
Wish I'd had this a few days ago, I just spent the last few days
writing parsers.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated -
All,
This project adds support in Clojure for Parsing Expression Grammars.
You'll be able to write pseudo-ebnfs directly in your Clojure code.
Currently, this...
Expr <- [Sum $]
Sum <- [Product (* [SumOp Product])]
Product <- [Value (* [ProductOp Value])]
Value <- (| Num Sum)
16 matches
Mail list logo
