On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Paul Mooser <taron...@gmail.com> wrote:
> At some point, hopefully someone will write an open-source parsing > library with liberal licensing terms for clojure. > Would you mind elaborating on your definitions for the terms "open-source" and "liberal licensing"? I'm not sure I like the current licensing scheme for clj-peg and I've spent quite a bit of time thinking about how I should approach this project's license in particular. I have two very different perspectives about this issue. On the one hand, if I were a user and not the developer I doubt I'd use this library because I really don't like paying for software. I also would be a bit wary of the 'except for commercial use' part in the license. On the other hand, I've put a significant amount of time and energy into this as a product. Money isn't what it used to be and I'm reluctant to lose the potential extra income that a dual license might provide. There is value in augmenting whatever reputation I have by providing the code for free, but reputation alone doesn't pay the bills. So... that's why I'm wondering if you would mind helping me understand your point-of-view. -Rich
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
