On 01/04/2009, at 1:26 PM, Rayne wrote:
>
> Unless they slowed down, the pace in which Enclojure was improving
> would put me dead on.
Neither the site nor the mailing list shows a lot of activity - it's
not dead, but it is taking a long time compared to the IntelliJ
support, which was my p
Unless they slowed down, the pace in which Enclojure was improving
would put me dead on. I personally use IntelliJ IDEA. But who says I
paid for it?
On Mar 31, 5:45 pm, Antony Blakey wrote:
> On 28/03/2009, at 5:21 PM, Rayne wrote:
>
> > I'd say Enclojure is close to
> > production-ready.
>
> F
just wanted to know because it didn't sound like it from the comparison
being made.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Antony Blakey wrote:
>
>
> On 01/04/2009, at 10:01 AM, e wrote:
>
> > but the InteliJ IDE isn't free, is it?
>
> So what? I'm a professional developer. I make money using these too
On 01/04/2009, at 10:01 AM, e wrote:
> but the InteliJ IDE isn't free, is it?
So what? I'm a professional developer. I make money using these tools.
The money people pay for IntelliJ is one reason that the Scala support
in IntelliJ is more ambitious and why the IntelliJ Clojure plugin is
but the InteliJ IDE isn't free, is it?
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Antony Blakey wrote:
>
>
> On 28/03/2009, at 5:21 PM, Rayne wrote:
>
> > I'd say Enclojure is close to
> > production-ready.
>
> From my playing with it, plus the list of things not yet done, I
> don't think this is true. Th
On 28/03/2009, at 5:21 PM, Rayne wrote:
> I'd say Enclojure is close to
> production-ready.
From my playing with it, plus the list of things not yet done, I
don't think this is true. The IntelliJ clojure support seems more
advanced right now, and I'm starting to use that in production. IMO
On Mar 31, 4:52 pm, Luc Prefontaine
wrote:
> I was searching for a Java alternative for our medical bus product and
> looked at Scala during summer 2008.
> I found it was too tied to an object model. The lack of a complete macro
> system was in my view also a short coming.
>
> I concluded that
I was searching for a Java alternative for our medical bus product and
looked at Scala during summer 2008.
I found it was too tied to an object model. The lack of a complete macro
system was in my view also a short coming.
I concluded that it was not a significant departure from Java. I really
wan
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Chas Emerick wrote:
>
> We shipped production software built in Scala last year, but likely
> will never do so again given clojure. Our primary motivating factor
> is the degree of complexity in the Scala, but since you're looking for
> "auxiliary" factors:
>
> -
We shipped production software built in Scala last year, but likely
will never do so again given clojure. Our primary motivating factor
is the degree of complexity in the Scala, but since you're looking for
"auxiliary" factors:
- clojure has a far richer "ecosystem" -- there's a metric ton
I sure hope this topic doesn't start a flamewar.
I've used both languages, with Clojure being used more.
Scala is more mature than Clojure, so you really have to put that in
perspective when comparing the languages. Scala's IDE support is
superior to Clojure's but not for long as all three major
Can anyone who has tried both of these languages to a decent degree compare
them in practical terms? In other words, I am not interested in the technical
aspects of the languages themselves (e.g. dynamic vs static typing) but
things like IDE support, tools (lexers and parsers), standard librar
12 matches
Mail list logo
