Unless they slowed down, the pace in which Enclojure was improving would put me dead on. I personally use IntelliJ IDEA. But who says I paid for it?
On Mar 31, 5:45 pm, Antony Blakey <antony.bla...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 28/03/2009, at 5:21 PM, Rayne wrote: > > > I'd say Enclojure is close to > > production-ready. > > From my playing with it, plus the list of things not yet done, I > don't think this is true. The IntelliJ clojure support seems more > advanced right now, and I'm starting to use that in production. IMO > the new NetBeans 6.7 L&F on OSX now looks better than any other java > IDE on OSX (but enclojure doesn't run on it). If enclojure did > formatting and ran on 6.7 I'd probably choose that for Clojure > development, although another consideration is that if you want to do > mixed Scala/Clojure development, IntelliJ's Scala support has > considerably loftier goals than Eclipse/NetBeans e.g. first-class > support for the language model wrt refactoring etc. > > Antony Blakey > -------------------------- > CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd > Ph: 0438 840 787 > > Lack of will power has caused more failure than lack of intelligence > or ability. > -- Flower A. Newhouse --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
