Hello,
At Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:21:03 -0800 (PST),
Stefan Kamphausen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> a short discussion on the SLIME mailinglist lead to the result that
> the arglist of a backend function in swank did change.
>
> Current checkouts of SLIME do not work with Clojure, at least if you
> use auto
You can still use slime-fancy and the arglist display feature by just
disabling autodoc mode like this:
(setq slime-use-autodoc-mode nil)
(slime-setup '(slime-fancy))
On Nov 18, 11:26 am, Constantine Vetoshev wrote:
> On Nov 17, 2:52 pm, David Nolen wrote:
>
> > Thanks for pursuing this so adam
Stefan Kamphausen writes:
>> Unless there are some really great features added upstream in slime,
>> fixing swank-clojure to work with their latest changes is a low priority.
>
> this is a pity, at least for those of us, who also use Slime to do
> some CL hacking. For that setup it is quite comm
On Nov 17, 2:52 pm, David Nolen wrote:
> Thanks for pursuing this so adamantly :) For a long time (more than a year)
> it was possible to use SLIME tip. It would be great for that to continue.
You can still use SLIME; just avoid the slime-autodoc contrib. Use
(slime-setup '(slime-repl))
to init
Stefan,
Thanks for pursuing this so adamantly :) For a long time (more than a year)
it was possible to use SLIME tip. It would be great for that to continue.
David
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Stefan Kamphausen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Nov 17, 1:47 pm, Stefan Kamphausen wrote:
>
> [...]
> > use
Hi,
On Nov 17, 1:47 pm, Stefan Kamphausen wrote:
[...]
> user=> user=> Connection opened on local port 37693
> # [addr=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0,port=0,localport=37693]>
> user=> user=> java.lang.InterruptedException
> [...]
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
> Caused by: java.lang.NullPoi
Hi,
Stefan Kamphausen wrote:
> I'll take a look at it the next few days (er, evenings that is), if I
> find the time. No promises ;-)
Not that I'm close to a solution, but at least I have stacktrace...
After some digging in the clojure-swank code I came across this piece
in swank.clj:
(defn- co
Stefan put in words what I was thinking earlier today. For those of us that use
both CL and clojure, keeping swank-clojure up to date wrt the slime HEAD is a
good thing, if you ask me. It is, however, a two-way street and I would imagine
that the swank-clojure implementors don't want to spend t
Hi,
Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> Unless there are some really great features added upstream in slime,
> fixing swank-clojure to work with their latest changes is a low priority.
this is a pity, at least for those of us, who also use Slime to do
some CL hacking. For that setup it is quite common to al
Stefan Kamphausen writes:
> a short discussion on the SLIME mailinglist lead to the result that
> the arglist of a backend function in swank did change.
>
> Current checkouts of SLIME do not work with Clojure, at least if you
> use autodoc.
>
> http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/2009-No
Heh: ";; Yeah, I'm lazy -- I'll flesh this out later"
Not sure if that's related to the problem, but it's amusing at least.
Cyrus
On Nov 15, 2009, at 6:21 AM, Stefan Kamphausen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a short discussion on the SLIME mailinglist lead to the result that
> the arglist of a backend f
Hi,
a short discussion on the SLIME mailinglist lead to the result that
the arglist of a backend function in swank did change.
Current checkouts of SLIME do not work with Clojure, at least if you
use autodoc.
http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/2009-November/016919.html
I took a quick
12 matches
Mail list logo
