Re: Regarding http://clojuredocs.org

2013-10-10 Thread Stefan du Fresne
Agree. I find the examples on clojuredocs really helpful (I find the official documentation often near-impenetrable), but it's super confusing how it references a bunch of old things. On Thursday, 10 October 2013 20:20:58 UTC+13, binita wrote: > > Yes , agree with puzzler . > Also the Search fe

Re: Regarding http://clojuredocs.org

2013-10-10 Thread binita
Yes , agree with puzzler . Also the Search feature at http://clojuredocs.org is awesome. Personally, as a newbie , I find it very helpful, to be able to search and see the examples. I didn't find the same at http://clojure.org/documentation, http://clojure.github.io/clojure or at http://clojur

Re: Regarding http://clojuredocs.org

2013-10-09 Thread Mark Engelberg
Sometimes, it's also useful to be able to take things out. I keep seeing people get confused by clojuredocs references to contrib libraries that have completely different names now. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this

Re: Regarding http://clojuredocs.org

2013-10-09 Thread Andy Fingerhut
For all but the few functions and macros added to Clojure since 1.3, ClojureDocs can be as actively maintained as people choose to update it. I add new facts that come to my attention there every so often, e.g.: http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/subs http://clojuredocs.org/

Re: Regarding http://clojuredocs.org

2013-10-09 Thread Bruce Wang
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Mark Engelberg wrote: > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Bruce Wang wrote: > >> The official docs is at http://clojure.org/documentation, >> http://clojure.github.io/clojure/ >> >> >> > Sure, but the nice thing about clojuredocs is that it includes examples > for m

Re: Regarding http://clojuredocs.org

2013-10-09 Thread Mark Engelberg
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Bruce Wang wrote: > The official docs is at http://clojure.org/documentation, > http://clojure.github.io/clojure/ > > > Sure, but the nice thing about clojuredocs is that it includes examples for most of the functions and for a while, it was updated more frequently

Re: Regarding http://clojuredocs.org

2013-10-09 Thread Marek Kubica
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 21:55:08 -0700 Andy Fingerhut wrote: > Those who created ClojureDocs.org made some progress towards > rewriting the server side code in Clojure (it was originally > developed in Ruby on Rails, IIRC), but have found it challenging to > find enough time to finish that work. I re

Re: Regarding http://clojuredocs.org

2013-10-08 Thread Andy Fingerhut
Those who created ClojureDocs.org made some progress towards rewriting the server side code in Clojure (it was originally developed in Ruby on Rails, IIRC), but have found it challenging to find enough time to finish that work. I recall a month or two ago someone mentioning that they would be inte

Re: Regarding http://clojuredocs.org

2013-10-08 Thread Bruce Wang
The official docs is at http://clojure.org/documentation, http://clojure.github.io/clojure/ On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:13 PM, binita wrote: > Hello everyone , > > Latest version of Clojure is 1.5. > But, http://clojuredocs.org only show docs for 1.2 and 1.3 versions. How > about 1.4 and 1.5 do

Regarding http://clojuredocs.org

2013-10-08 Thread binita
Hello everyone , Latest version of Clojure is 1.5. But, http://clojuredocs.org only show docs for 1.2 and 1.3 versions. How about 1.4 and 1.5 documentation ? Thanks Binita -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group,