For all but the few functions and macros added to Clojure since 1.3,
ClojureDocs can be as actively maintained as people choose to update it.  I
add new facts that come to my attention there every so often, e.g.:

    http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/subs
    http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/read
    http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/sorted-set-by

I'm not saying this is an ideal situation, but it isn't terrible, either.
There is also clojure-doc.org which is updated quite often, although it has
a different focus than ClojureDocs.org.

The Clojure Cheatsheet pointing at clojuredocs.org was my choice.  It
didn't seem terribly useful to have the links point at the
Autodoc-generated documentation, because I am pretty sure those are not
much more than the doc strings, which are available much more quickly in
the cheat sheet pop-up tool tips.

Andy


On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Bruce Wang <br...@brucewang.net> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Mark Engelberg 
> <mark.engelb...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Bruce Wang <br...@brucewang.net> wrote:
>>
>>> The official docs is at http://clojure.org/documentation,
>>> http://clojure.github.io/clojure/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Sure, but the nice thing about clojuredocs is that it includes examples
>> for most of the functions and for a while, it was updated more frequently
>> than the regular documentation site.
>>
>> For example, I noticed the other day that in the main documentation site,
>> in the java interop section, there isn't much discussion about the
>> possibility of annotating functions of up to four arguments with primitive
>> types.  The fib example still shows the old way of handling primitives.
>> Where is one to learn these details?  Similarly, I noticed that the only
>> documentation about reducers is still a link to the original blog posts
>> which outline the idea, but are by no means thorough.  It would be great to
>> get back to having an active documentation repository for community
>> contributions.
>>
>
> Yep, you are right, I didn't realise The Clojure Cheatsheet[1] is actually
> pointing to clojuredocs.org
>
> [1]
> http://jafingerhut.github.io/cheatsheet-clj-1.3/cheatsheet-tiptip-cdocs-summary.html
>
>
>
> --
> simple is good
> http://brucewang.net
> http://twitter.com/number5
>
> --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to