2010/11/25 HiHeelHottie
>
> Ken,
>
> Thanks for putting this together. As a newbie, this gives me a lot to
> mull over. Can you explain the convention of a * at the end of a
> function name?
>
Hi, it's a common convention when you have both a macro and a function, the
macro generally delegatin
Ken,
Thanks for putting this together. As a newbie, this gives me a lot to
mull over. Can you explain the convention of a * at the end of a
function name?
On Nov 24, 12:39 am, Ken Wesson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:45 PM, HiHeelHottie wrote:
>
> > Does anybody know of an implementati
Thanks!
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Tom Faulhaber wrote:
> OK, I'm doing stuff there now.
>
> I'll move the comment to the ns doc string, then.
>
> There are still issues with autodoc and protocols/types, but priority
> queues look like they'll be a good sandbox for resolving them.
>
> Tom
>
OK, I'm doing stuff there now.
I'll move the comment to the ns doc string, then.
There are still issues with autodoc and protocols/types, but priority
queues look like they'll be a good sandbox for resolving them.
Tom
On Nov 24, 2:51 am, Mark Engelberg wrote:
> No reason other than my lack of
No reason other than my lack of knowledge that ns doc strings are picked up
by autodoc and comments are not. :)
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Tom Faulhaber wrote:
> Mark,
>
> Is there a reason that you put the documentation in a comment rather
> than as the ns doc string so that autodoc would
2010/11/24 HiHeelHottie :
>
> Does anybody know of an implementation for a priority queue that can
> be used for scheduling events in the future? I would like to put a
> map associated with a timestamp into the queue and be able to pull out
> all maps at or before a given time in order.
I would a
Mark,
Is there a reason that you put the documentation in a comment rather
than as the ns doc string so that autodoc would pick it up? Currently,
priority queues are undiscoverable by autodoc users.
Tom
On Nov 23, 9:41 pm, Mark Engelberg wrote:
> In 1.3, you can use clojure.contrib.priority-map
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Ken Wesson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:45 PM, HiHeelHottie wrote:
>>
>> Does anybody know of an implementation for a priority queue that can
>> be used for scheduling events in the future? I would like to put a
>> map associated with a timestamp into the
In 1.3, you can use clojure.contrib.priority-map.
Documentation found in comment at top of source:
https://github.com/clojure/clojure-contrib/blob/master/modules/priority-map/src/main/clojure/clojure/contrib/priority_map.clj
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Gr
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:45 PM, HiHeelHottie wrote:
>
> Does anybody know of an implementation for a priority queue that can
> be used for scheduling events in the future? I would like to put a
> map associated with a timestamp into the queue and be able to pull out
> all maps at or before a gi
Ulises, thanks for the response. The insertions will be sprinkled out
over time and would want insertions/removals to be reasonably
efficient.
On Nov 23, 11:58 pm, Ulises wrote:
> > Does anybody know of an implementation for a priority queue that can
> > be used for scheduling events in the fut
> Does anybody know of an implementation for a priority queue that can
> be used for scheduling events in the future? I would like to put a
> map associated with a timestamp into the queue and be able to pull out
> all maps at or before a given time in order.
You can do so with a combination of t
12 matches
Mail list logo
