OK, I'm doing stuff there now. I'll move the comment to the ns doc string, then.
There are still issues with autodoc and protocols/types, but priority queues look like they'll be a good sandbox for resolving them. Tom On Nov 24, 2:51 am, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote: > No reason other than my lack of knowledge that ns doc strings are picked up > by autodoc and comments are not. :) > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Tom Faulhaber <tomfaulha...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > Mark, > > > Is there a reason that you put the documentation in a comment rather > > than as the ns doc string so that autodoc would pick it up? Currently, > > priority queues are undiscoverable by autodoc users. > > > Tom -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
