Thanks Ken .. "into" is cool .. it does better..
Sunil.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Shantanu Kumar
> wrote:
> > On Mar 22, 1:15 pm, Sunil S Nandihalli
> > wrote:
> >> Hello everybody,
> >> I was wondering why there is no 1 argument ver
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Shantanu Kumar
wrote:
> On Mar 22, 1:15 pm, Sunil S Nandihalli
> wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>> I was wondering why there is no 1 argument version of conj and disj. I
>> think that would be very convenient. Especially when used in the following
>> way
>>
>> (apply
Thanks Shanthanu ..
Sunil.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Shantanu Kumar wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 22, 1:15 pm, Sunil S Nandihalli
> wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> > I was wondering why there is no 1 argument version of conj and disj. I
> > think that would be very convenient. Especially when used i
On Mar 22, 1:15 pm, Sunil S Nandihalli
wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> I was wondering why there is no 1 argument version of conj and disj. I
> think that would be very convenient. Especially when used in the following
> way
>
> (apply conj some-collection collection-of-elements-to-be-conjed)
>
> C