Thanks Shanthanu ..
Sunil.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Shantanu Kumar <kumar.shant...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 22, 1:15 pm, Sunil S Nandihalli <sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> > I was wondering why there is no 1 argument version of conj and disj. I
> > think that would be very convenient. Especially when used in the
> following
> > way
> >
> > (apply conj some-collection collection-of-elements-to-be-conjed)
> >
> > Currently the above usage would fail for both conj and disj when the
> > collection of elements to be conjed is empty . So, I need to check if the
> > collection is empty and use appropriately.. but just thought having conj
> and
> > disj just return the original collection when there are no keys to be
> conjed
> > or disjed would be very convenient
> >
> > May be I should be using something else .. I would like to what that
> other
> > function is.
>
> Maybe these:
> user=> (reduce conj [] [1 2 3 4])
> [1 2 3 4]
> user=> (reduce disj #{1 2 3 4} [1 2 3 4])
> #{}
>
> Is that what you were looking for?
>
> Regards,
> Shantanu
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
