On Mar 29, 10:56 pm, Nick Zbinden wrote:
> One more thing people should do is update there blogs. I know its
> stupid work but I should be done. Its extremly confusing when google
> for something.
>
> Update your blog with a little notice or update it that it is correct
> again.
Excellent point.
Yup. After seeing this thread start up, I went back thru my handful of
Clojure posts and double-checked links and examples (and found my post
about getting started with Leiningen no longer worked in some places
and provided different output in others - so I fixed it). Keeping
seven and a half years
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Rayne wrote:
> I think emailing me or telling me on IRC or
> twitter or one of the other easily found and plentiful ways to get a
> hold of me is much better than complaining about it as if it were
> something that is impossible to fix.
I tweeted it was down with
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Nick Zbinden wrote:
> > Dare I mention the idea of an official (or semi-official) Clojure
> documentation project that ties together the disparate sources that
> currently exist? What say you, community?
>
> I was thinking about something. This is just an idea spi
> Dare I mention the idea of an official (or semi-official) Clojure
> documentation project that ties together the disparate sources that currently
> exist? What say you, community?
I was thinking about something. This is just an idea spil I didn't do
anything jet.
Kind of like a learning assis
Dare I mention the idea of an official (or semi-official) Clojure documentation
project that ties together the disparate sources that currently exist? What say
you, community?
There is a lot of information out there that simply needs to be placed in the
right bucket in order for it to be useful
One more thing people should do is update there blogs. I know its
stupid work but I should be done. Its extremly confusing when google
for something.
Update your blog with a little notice or update it that it is correct
again.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
It is a hosting problem. Heinz (Licenser) currently hosts the domain
and the site as well. It is not really under my control. I had no idea
that the site was down. I think emailing me or telling me on IRC or
twitter or one of the other easily found and plentiful ways to get a
hold of me is much bet
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Devin Walters wrote:
> TryClojure is an opportunity, not a liability. Treat it as such.
Oh, I agree that it is an opportunity, but in its present yo-yo state
it will reflect poorly on the main site and have unintended
consequences. I wholeheartedly support the ide
My understanding is that it's mostly a hosting problem. I'll ask
Raynes about it - the code is mostly his, as I understand it.
On Mar 29, 5:08 pm, Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
> >> Pointing out try-clojure.org would probably be a good thing there
> >>
-1
TryClojure is an opportunity, not a liability. Treat it as such.
2c
Sent via mobile
On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:00 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
>> Having one central authoritative Getting Started page might be a good
>> thing.
>
> +1
>
>> Howev
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
>> Pointing out try-clojure.org would probably be a good thing there
>> (although that site is currently down)
>
> Terrible idea, unless that site is going to become a *lot* more
> reliable in the very near future and then stay that way.
I agree
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> Having one central authoritative Getting Started page might be a good
> thing.
+1
> However, the official page isn't very welcoming for newbies right now
> since it assumes you either start with an IDE or a build tool.
> Pointing out try-cl
An effort to enumerate misleading stackoverflow answers is another noteworthy
endeavor that requires a bit of attention.
Food for thought.
Sent via mobile
On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:44 AM, Stuart Halloway wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> One way to help people getting started with Clojure is to make sure the
I use confluence elsewhere and it is fine.
On 30/03/11 04:14, Sean Corfield wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Stuart Halloway
wrote:
[2] NEW http://dev.clojure.org/display/doc/Getting+Started
Sometimes this wiki seems grindingly slow (for me, at least). Is that
a known issue with Confl
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Stuart Halloway
wrote:
> [2] NEW http://dev.clojure.org/display/doc/Getting+Started
Sometimes this wiki seems grindingly slow (for me, at least). Is that
a known issue with Confluence or that server?
> [5] OLD http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Clojure_Programming/Gett
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Stuart Halloway
wrote:
> I would appreciate it if somebody would volunteer to update the content on
> wikibooks [5]. It is extremely misleading because it mixes recent edits,
> somewhat dated material, and very dated material. Would it be better if
> wikibooks just
I think wikibooks has value on its own (it helped me when i was
starting). I can help do some work to clean the old stuff, update it,
improve it, etc.
Best
Federico
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Stuart Halloway
wrote:
> Hi all,
> One way to help people getting started with Clojure is to make
18 matches
Mail list logo
