On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:20 PM, mikel wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Christophe Grand
>>
>> > clojure.xml currently removes significant whitespaces. I guess that
>> > people processing xml as data want this behavior (while people
>> > processing xml as mark-up don't). What's the be
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Christophe Grand wrote:
> Mark Volkmann a écrit :
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Christophe Grand
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Remco van 't Veer a écrit :
>>>
Maybe *ignore-whitespace* is a beter name since it doesn't remove
anything and will retain some of i
Mark Volkmann a écrit :
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Christophe Grand
> wrote:
>
>> Remco van 't Veer a écrit :
>>
>>> Maybe *ignore-whitespace* is a beter name since it doesn't remove
>>> anything and will retain some of it. I would prefer it to default to
>>> true.
>>>
>>>
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Christophe Grand wrote:
>
> Remco van 't Veer a écrit :
>> Maybe *ignore-whitespace* is a beter name since it doesn't remove
>> anything and will retain some of it. I would prefer it to default to
>> true.
>>
>
> I would prefer it to default to false since it's t
Remco van 't Veer a écrit :
> Maybe *ignore-whitespace* is a beter name since it doesn't remove
> anything and will retain some of it. I would prefer it to default to
> true.
>
I would prefer it to default to false since it's the standard way to
handle whitespace in XML. (Ignorable whitespac
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Christophe Grand
>
> wrote:
>
> > clojure.xml currently removes significant whitespaces. I guess that
> > people processing xml as data want this behavior (while people
> > processing xml as mark-up don't). What's the best way to accomodate
> > these to use
Maybe *ignore-whitespace* is a beter name since it doesn't remove
anything and will retain some of it. I would prefer it to default to
true.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Christophe Grand
wrote:
>
> clojure.xml currently removes significant whitespaces. I guess that
> people processing xml
