On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Christophe Grand <christo...@cgrand.net> wrote:
> Mark Volkmann a écrit :
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Christophe Grand <christo...@cgrand.net> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Remco van 't Veer a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Maybe *ignore-whitespace* is a beter name since it doesn't remove
>>>> anything and will retain some of it.  I would prefer it to default to
>>>> true.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I would prefer it to default to false since it's the standard way to
>>> handle whitespace in XML. (Ignorable whitespaces are always ignored by
>>> clojure.xml.)
>>>
>>
>> I agree. That would be consistent with Apache Xerces which also uses
>> that term and retains all whitespace by default.
>>
>
> Patch attached.
>
> Mark, by "all whitespace" do you mean all significant whitespaces or
> really all whitespaces (including ignorable whitespaces)?

Good catch. I should have said "ignorable whitespace".

-- 
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to