I can't speak for Michal, but here's my take:
Developers working on and with open source languages typically like to
use licenses compatible with the main language. When I say open
source, I mean in the sense conveyed by the OSI (found here:
http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php). When I s
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Paul Mooser wrote:
> At some point, hopefully someone will write an open-source parsing
> library with liberal licensing terms for clojure.
>
Would you mind elaborating on your definitions for the terms "open-source"
and "liberal licensing"?
I'm not sure I like
At some point, hopefully someone will write an open-source parsing
library with liberal licensing terms for clojure.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new
I'm not familiar with Scala's parser combinators, in addition, I'm fuzzy on
the technical definition of a parser combinator.
I think I'd call it a parser combinator, since the grammar is embedded in
the code using native Clojure data structures, evaluation can be delayed,
and grammar definitions c
I forgot to appreciate having something like clg-peg to play with...
no clue where my manners went. Is this comparable at all to Scala's
parser combinators?
On Jan 5, 12:17 am, Richard Lyman wrote:
> Yeah, the management software for my site is in flux. Getting RSS done is on
> the todo list, but
Yeah, the management software for my site is in flux. Getting RSS done is on
the todo list, but not very high.
There really aren't pre-releases - when I have a version to release I
announce it here as soon as it's available. I hadn't thought that there
might actually be people interested in pre-re
An RSS feed might help early adopters test prereleases, but it's been
explicitly disabled?
On Jan 4, 5:43 pm, Richard Lyman wrote:
> Oh, sorry!
>
> I was thinking about releasing this version last week - but with the new
> year likely taking precedence I thought I'd wait.
>
> Maybe next time I'll
Oh, sorry!
I was thinking about releasing this version last week - but with the new
year likely taking precedence I thought I'd wait.
Maybe next time I'll send you a version a few days before I announce it. ;-)
-Rich
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Anniepoo wrote:
> Sweet!
>
> Wish I'd had
Sweet!
Wish I'd had this a few days ago, I just spent the last few days
writing parsers.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated -
