On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Christophe Grand
wrote:
>
> You can: simply load them using different class loaders -- this way you'll
> have several RT.
Yeah, that might work. I had hoped to get around dealing with multiple
classloaders and calling the RT methods via Reflection, but I guess
t
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Roman Roelofsen <
roman.roelof...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> 2009/10/12 Christophe Grand :
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Roman Roelofsen
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > Plus, if you use a shared loader for most interfaces, clojure
> instances
> >> > will
> >> > be
2009/10/12 Christophe Grand :
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Roman Roelofsen
> wrote:
>>
>> > Plus, if you use a shared loader for most interfaces, clojure instances
>> > will
>> > be able to share persistent data and closures.
>>
>> Nope, I tried this and it didn't work. The classloader exp
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Roman Roelofsen <
roman.roelof...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Plus, if you use a shared loader for most interfaces, clojure instances
> will
> > be able to share persistent data and closures.
>
> Nope, I tried this and it didn't work. The classloader explicitly
>
> Plus, if you use a shared loader for most interfaces, clojure instances will
> be able to share persistent data and closures.
Nope, I tried this and it didn't work. The classloader explicitly
complained that e.g. Var and RT have not been loaded by the same
classloader :-/
--~--~-~--~--
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Manuel Woelker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While hacking on counterclockwise I noticed that the clojure.lang code
> uses a lot of static variables and methods. As far as I can tell this
> makes it almost impossible to have two or more separate instances of
> the clojure run
