On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Roman Roelofsen < roman.roelof...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > 2009/10/12 Christophe Grand <christo...@cgrand.net>: > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Roman Roelofsen > > <roman.roelof...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Plus, if you use a shared loader for most interfaces, clojure > instances > >> > will > >> > be able to share persistent data and closures. > >> > >> Nope, I tried this and it didn't work. The classloader explicitly > >> complained that e.g. Var and RT have not been loaded by the same > >> classloader :-/ > > > > Sadly I know and that's why I said "most interfaces" (eg all interfaces > > starting with "I" and Associative, Counted, Seqable, Reversible and > > Sequential are safe) -- at least last time I tried. > > Good point. And since most clojure data types are based on java types > (e.g. Map, Callable) the shared parent classloader is already there. > > Except if you only rely on java interfaces, you won't be able to: conj (or assoc/dissoc, pop, peek etc.) shared data and to pass arguments to shared closures. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
