On Sep 30, 11:17 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 30, 5:04 am, Achim Passen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 30, 5:20 am, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > After some more thought, I'm not sure whether this should be a concern
> > > or not. Since j
On Sep 30, 11:17 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feedback welcome,
Yes, please let Clojure maps implement java.util.Map. As long as seq
and coll? still work on maps, I think the breakage will be minimal.
-Stuart Sierra
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You recei
Am 30.09.2008 um 17:20 schrieb Paul Barry:
> On Sep 30, 11:17 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've been thinking about this Map vs Collection issue for a while now
>> and am considering making the move to: Clojure maps implement Java
>> Map.
>
> Yes, please do! +1!
Yes, that’s muc
On Sep 30, 11:17 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been thinking about this Map vs Collection issue for a while now
> and am considering making the move to: Clojure maps implement Java
> Map.
Yes, please do! +1!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received th
On Sep 30, 5:04 am, Achim Passen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 30, 5:20 am, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > After some more thought, I'm not sure whether this should be a concern
> > or not. Since jmap's purpose is to wrap Clojure maps for passing to
> > Java APIs, I'
On Sep 30, 5:20 am, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After some more thought, I'm not sure whether this should be a concern
> or not. Since jmap's purpose is to wrap Clojure maps for passing to
> Java APIs, I'm not sure when it will be necessary to compare jmaps to
> Clojur
Hi Steve,
thank you for taking a look and for your suggestions!
> This part concerns me:
>
> > Note: Since clojure maps are no java maps, they can't be equal to java
> > maps. This holds for wrapped clojure maps as well - surprisingly (in a
> > bad sense), but i don't see a way around this:
>
>
On Sep 29, 2008, at 3:20 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote:
> This part concerns me:
>
>> Note: Since clojure maps are no java maps, they can't be equal to
>> java
>> maps. This holds for wrapped clojure maps as well - surprisingly
>> (in a
>> bad sense), but i don't see a way around this:
>>
>>
Hi achim,
That looks like a fine start. Thanks for doing it!
This part concerns me:
> Note: Since clojure maps are no java maps, they can't be equal to java
> maps. This holds for wrapped clojure maps as well - surprisingly (in a
> bad sense), but i don't see a way around this:
>
>(= (doto (
