On Sep 30, 5:20 am, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After some more thought, I'm not sure whether this should be a concern > or not. Since jmap's purpose is to wrap Clojure maps for passing to > Java APIs, I'm not sure when it will be necessary to compare jmaps to > Clojure maps. In the abstract, it would be nice if they could be > compared for equality, but I'm not sure how important this is in > practice. I tend to agree. In most cases there should be no doubts whether a map at hand is wrapped or not. If otherwise, you could safely unwrap both via cmap (that's the reason why i wrote cmap to act "forgivingly" when not applied to jmaps) and then compare afterwards. Kind regards, achim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
