Re: New to Clojure -- Errors Are Frustrating

2011-08-03 Thread Brian Marick
On Aug 2, 2011, at 7:23 PM, Armando Blancas wrote: > Check out the work of Warren Teitelman on > Conversational LISP and Do What I Mean, way back when most in this > board weren't even born. Around 1985, I heard Teitelman's "Do What I Mean" (DWIM) referred to as DWWTWHM ("Do What Warren Teitel

Re: New to Clojure -- Errors Are Frustrating

2011-08-03 Thread Brian Goslinga
On Aug 2, 8:39 am, Ken Wesson wrote: > It is true that the messages commonly encountered could stand to be > better documented on a Clojure site. I'm wondering if we could go > further, though, and make REPL exception printing more informative. > The Java exception gets stored in *e, so someone ca

Re: New to Clojure -- Errors Are Frustrating

2011-08-03 Thread Nicolas
On 3 août, 03:00, Mark wrote: > The compiler might not be able to do better but the runtime system certainly > could.  In this case, both filtered and more information is what's needed.   > Why couldn't the runtime generate a message like: > Symbol "fac" of type clojure.lang.IFn is used where type

Re: New to Clojure -- Errors Are Frustrating

2011-08-03 Thread MarisO
(defn fac [n] (if (= n 1) 1 (* n fac (- n 1 your code tries to multiply n by function this is correct: (defn fac [n] (if (= n 1) 1 (* n (fac (- n 1) On Aug 2, 8:11 am, recurve7 wrote: > In browsing this group I see this topic has been brought up several > times over the past 3 years

Re: New to Clojure -- Errors Are Frustrating

2011-08-02 Thread Mark
The compiler might not be able to do better but the runtime system certainly could. In this case, both filtered and more information is what's needed. Why couldn't the runtime generate a message like: Symbol "fac" of type clojure.lang.IFn is used where type java.lang.Number is expected in #2 o

Re: New to Clojure -- Errors Are Frustrating

2011-08-02 Thread Luc Prefontaine
I've been coding in Clojure since mid-2008, I have a Lisp background but coded mainly in Java for a number of years (2000-2010) I still goof from time to time with parenthesis. Just yesterday, I screwed up some expression imbrication in a module and it took me at least 30 mns to figure it out. Ok

Re: New to Clojure -- Errors Are Frustrating

2011-08-02 Thread Lee Spector
On Aug 2, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Armando Blancas wrote: > Check out the work of Warren Teitelman on > Conversational LISP and Do What I Mean, way back when most in this > board weren't even born. CLISP could handle your typo, > unsympathetically called "careless" in the paper; oh, well... Ah, INTERLIS

Re: New to Clojure -- Errors Are Frustrating

2011-08-02 Thread Brent Millare
The following code may prove useful as well. (defmacro log "for debugging, output code and code->val to stdout or optional writer, returns val, custom-fn accepts two arguments, the code, and the result, it must return a string" ([code] `(let [c# ~code] (prn '~code) (clojur

Re: New to Clojure -- Errors Are Frustrating

2011-08-02 Thread Armando Blancas
> It's encouraging to see the community is thinking of > ways to improve this. We shouldn't, however, expect any significant improvements, IMO. For the reasons explained, and the fact that lisp has almost no syntax, this is a difficult problem to solve. Not that it has prevented people from trying

Re: New to Clojure -- Errors Are Frustrating

2011-08-02 Thread recurve7
Hi Jeremy, I'm not just thinking about Clojure from the perspective of a Java person, but also from the perspective of someone new to programming and for kids. For the latter, it's best if languages have maximum friendliness in error wording and error messages pointed at a specific character posit

Re: New to Clojure -- Errors Are Frustrating

2011-08-02 Thread recurve7
Thank you, Ken. It's encouraging to see the community is thinking of ways to improve this. On Aug 2, 6:39 am, Ken Wesson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:11 AM, recurve7 wrote: > > Here's one example where recursion and lack of positional error > > feedback make it hard for me, as someone comin

Re: New to Clojure -- Errors Are Frustrating

2011-08-02 Thread recurve7
Thanks for the replies. I see 1.3 Beta 1 provides some more Java context that helps me find the problem, although it still doesn't afford Clojure its own uniquely-searchable error system or positional error references. On Aug 2, 6:31 am, Sergey Didenko wrote: > It got improved a lot in Clojure 1.

Re: New to Clojure -- Errors Are Frustrating

2011-08-02 Thread Sean Corfield
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:11 AM, recurve7 wrote: > user=> (defn fac [n] (if (= n 1) 1 (* n fac (- n 1 > #'user/fac > user=> (fac 3) > java.lang.ClassCastException: user$fac cannot be cast to > java.lang.Number (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0) > Let's assume you'd put the code in a source file and run that

Re: New to Clojure -- Errors Are Frustrating

2011-08-02 Thread Jeremy Heiler
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:11 AM, recurve7 wrote: > Here's one example where recursion and lack of positional error > feedback make it hard for me, as someone coming from Java, to spot the > error (and seeing "ClassCastException" threw me off and had me > wondering where/how I had done something lik

Re: New to Clojure -- Errors Are Frustrating

2011-08-02 Thread Ken Wesson
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:11 AM, recurve7 wrote: > Here's one example where recursion and lack of positional error > feedback make it hard for me, as someone coming from Java, to spot the > error (and seeing "ClassCastException" threw me off and had me > wondering where/how I had done something lik

Re: New to Clojure -- Errors Are Frustrating

2011-08-02 Thread Sergey Didenko
It got improved a lot in Clojure 1.3 which is beta for a while. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your