On 3 août, 03:00, Mark <markaddle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The compiler might not be able to do better but the runtime system certainly
> could.  In this case, both filtered and more information is what's needed.  
> Why couldn't the runtime generate a message like:
> Symbol "fac" of type clojure.lang.IFn is used where type java.lang.Number is
> expected in #2 operand to function *
>
> Of course, if this information were structured in some well-understood way,
> IDEs could consume the error and do an awfully good job of putting the
> cursor on exactly where the error is occurring.  When I code in clojure, IDE
> assistance for situations like this is probably the thing that I miss the
> most.

I agree that it would make us more effective. But honestly, before
that, I tend to find my clojure ide, to be very lacking. If I type
CTRL-SHIFT-T I can search for java type instantly but auto completion
in the editor for exampel take more than 10 seconds.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to