I'd love to attend as well :P
- Prashanth
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:49 PM, kkw wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
>Thanks for craeting the videos. They've been the most helpful
> monad tutorial I've ever followed. I'm looking forward to the next
> video! Keep up the good work.
>
> Kevin
>
> On Mar 13, 1
Hi Brian,
Thanks for craeting the videos. They've been the most helpful
monad tutorial I've ever followed. I'm looking forward to the next
video! Keep up the good work.
Kevin
On Mar 13, 11:20 am, Brian Marick wrote:
> I don't know if this is useful, but I've been doing a series of videos on
On Mar 12, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Brian Marick wrote:
>> http://www.vimeo.com/20963938
>
> Your sequence-decider can be simplified a bit: (mapcat rest-fn step-val). :)
Yes, but separating the map from the concat makes the explanation flow better
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Brian Marick wrote:
> http://www.vimeo.com/20963938
Your sequence-decider can be simplified a bit: (mapcat rest-fn step-val). :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to cl
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 18:20, Brian Marick wrote:
> I don't know if this is useful, but I've been doing a series of videos on
> monads. They have a different style than others I've read (very visual,
> avoiding standard jargon, not caring about category theory). They might be
> useful to people
I don't know if this is useful, but I've been doing a series of videos on
monads. They have a different style than others I've read (very visual,
avoiding standard jargon, not caring about category theory). They might be
useful to people joining the session.
http://www.vimeo.com/20717301
http:/
Thanks for all who responded. I'll be in touch in private email.
On Mar 11, 1:50 pm, Daniel Werner
wrote:
> On Mar 9, 8:15 pm, jim wrote:
>
> > So, my question is how many would be interested in such a session?
> > This would be a basic introduction to monads. Future session could be
> > about m
On Mar 9, 8:15 pm, jim wrote:
> So, my question is how many would be interested in such a session?
> This would be a basic introduction to monads. Future session could be
> about more advanced monad topics, if there was a demand for that.
I'd *love* to attend. Even with such a vast amount of onli
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Vagif Verdi wrote:
> Jim, i assume you are familiar with haskell (monads -> haskell :))
>
> So my question is, can you describe the difference in working with
> monads in dynamic language (clojure) with working with monads in
> haskell.
> From my own experience i
Jim, i assume you are familiar with haskell (monads -> haskell :))
So my question is, can you describe the difference in working with
monads in dynamic language (clojure) with working with monads in
haskell.
>From my own experience i would say that without a firm help from
typing system i would st
I'd be interested as well; sounds awesome :)
Thanks for your offer,
~Adam~
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patie
I'd love to assit too (I like the fact that it'd be interactive). Just
to let you know I'm on GMT (for when you schedule things).
Cheers,
U
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Jim, I would love to assist, I think it's a great initiative
Cheers.
Federico
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:50 AM, jim wrote:
> Definitely free. :)
>
> I feel like there are already a ton of resources for reading/watching
> to learn monads, and yet people still have trouble getting over the
> hum
Definitely free. :)
I feel like there are already a ton of resources for reading/watching
to learn monads, and yet people still have trouble getting over the
hump. So my thought was that this would be different because there
would be chance for interaction. So I probably wouldn't record it.
The t
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:45 AM, jim wrote:
> I gave a talk at CodePaLOUsa on monads and got some favorable
> feedback. So I thought I'd offer to do a live training session on
> monads using pretty much the same material, but at a shared REPL
> rather than with slides.
>
> How it would work is I
I'd be interested. This doesn't really scale though in the way a recording
does. Are you thinking this would give you a chance to practice teaching it
before making a recording?
Maybe post the slides so people can get an idea of what will be covered.
Also, maybe clarify whether this is free (http
+1 (though I'll have to read about tmux first) :)
Regards,
Manoj.
On Mar 10, 12:15 am, jim wrote:
> I gave a talk at CodePaLOUsa on monads and got some favorable
> feedback. So I thought I'd offer to do a live training session on
> monads using pretty much the same material, but at a shared REPL
17 matches
Mail list logo
