On Sunday, March 17, 2013 6:02:07 AM UTC+1, vemv wrote:
> Ahhh I tracked it down - the class was not public. I thought .java files
> had to define at least (and at most) *one* public class/enum/interface.
>
> How much sense can it make to define a private class in its own file? :(
>
It makes per
Ahhh I tracked it down - the class was not public. I thought .java files
had to define at least (and at most) *one* public class/enum/interface.
How much sense can it make to define a private class in its own file? :(
On Sunday, March 17, 2013 5:54:58 AM UTC+1, vemv wrote:
>
> The relevant Java
