Ahhh I tracked it down - the class was not public. I thought .java files had to define at least (and at most) *one* public class/enum/interface.
How much sense can it make to define a private class in its own file? :( On Sunday, March 17, 2013 5:54:58 AM UTC+1, vemv wrote: > > The relevant Java code: > > // its class extends Thread > > // assigned a value in static initializer > public static volatile ClassLoader classLoader = null; > > What happens when I try access it from Clojure: > > user=> vemv.NGSession/classLoader > > IllegalAccessException Class clojure.lang.Reflector can not access a > member of class vemv.NGSession with modifiers "public static volatile" > sun.reflect.Reflection.ensureMemberAccess (Reflection.java:95) > > Fortunately I could reproduce the issue isolatedly, in the following class > which has no dependencies/etc: https://gist.github.com/vemv/5180168 > > If I try reproduce the issue absolutely from scratch though, it disappears: > > package vemv; > > public class Foo extends Thread { > public static volatile ClassLoader classLoader = null; > static { > try { > classLoader = Foo.class.getClassLoader(); > } catch (SecurityException e) { > throw e; > } > } > } > > Any ideas? Should I just open a bug report? > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
