http://github.com/richhickey/clojure/commit/5772be9fc5ac9ddf92b727908c20b9aab971224a
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:12 PM, alux wrote:
> Yep, know that, been there ;-))
>
> On 31 Mai, 21:39, ataggart wrote:
>> On May 31, 12:18 am, alux wrote:
>>
>> > Ah, thank you - I still shy away from looking int
Yep, know that, been there ;-))
On 31 Mai, 21:39, ataggart wrote:
> On May 31, 12:18 am, alux wrote:
>
> > Ah, thank you - I still shy away from looking into Richs sources, but
> > here it helps: Ratio doesn't have getter for numerator and denominator
> > - they are just public ;-)
>
> Ha! A bli
On May 31, 12:18 am, alux wrote:
> Ah, thank you - I still shy away from looking into Richs sources, but
> here it helps: Ratio doesn't have getter for numerator and denominator
> - they are just public ;-)
Ha! A blindspot due to writing idiomatic java for far too long.
>
> Being final thats
Ah, thank you - I still shy away from looking into Richs sources, but
here it helps: Ratio doesn't have getter for numerator and denominator
- they are just public ;-)
Being final thats okay of course.
So. Whether this helps, I dont know too. I still dont have the lever,
but now I have a point to
Ratio doesn't emit the numerator and denominator:
http://github.com/richhickey/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/Ratio.java
I'm not sure that would help solve your problem, even if it were
available. You either need to turn the ratio into a non-ratio (using
float or double) or use unchecke
Hello,
I careless used rationals in a function, and, well, it took some
minutes to understand why it was slowing down. (I did this formatting
by (println (* 1.0 x)) when it started being unreadable - and forgot
that).
I still see rationals as very nice, but try to use them carefully now.
What I w
