http://github.com/richhickey/clojure/commit/5772be9fc5ac9ddf92b727908c20b9aab971224a
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:12 PM, alux <alu...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Yep, know that, been there ;-)) > > On 31 Mai, 21:39, ataggart <alex.tagg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On May 31, 12:18 am, alux <alu...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> > Ah, thank you - I still shy away from looking into Richs sources, but >> > here it helps: Ratio doesn't have getter for numerator and denominator >> > - they are just public ;-) >> >> Ha! A blindspot due to writing idiomatic java for far too long. >> >> >> >> > Being final thats okay of course. >> >> > So. Whether this helps, I dont know too. I still dont have the lever, >> > but now I have a point to place it at ;-) >> >> > Regards, alux >> >> > On 31 Mai, 04:10, ataggart <alex.tagg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > > Ratio doesn't emit the numerator and >> > > denominator:http://github.com/richhickey/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang... >> >> > > I'm not sure that would help solve your problem, even if it were >> > > available. You either need to turn the ratio into a non-ratio (using >> > > float or double) or use unchecked math functions which are subject to >> > > truncation (e.g., unchecked-multiply). >> >> > > On May 30, 1:32 pm, alux <alu...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> > > > Hello, >> >> > > > I careless used rationals in a function, and, well, it took some >> > > > minutes to understand why it was slowing down. (I did this formatting >> > > > by (println (* 1.0 x)) when it started being unreadable - and forgot >> > > > that). >> >> > > > I still see rationals as very nice, but try to use them carefully now. >> > > > What I would really like is a possibility to round to a numer of a >> > > > certain size. Like, to an continued fraction of a certain size. But, >> > > > there I need access to the length of numerator and denominator. >> >> > > > Now the question - is there any way to access this (or to reach to >> > > > goal of rounding to a rational), that is easier than using the >> > > > BigIntegers myself? >> >> > > > Thank you, alux > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- And what is good, Phaedrus, And what is not good— Need we ask anyone to tell us these things? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
