alive."
> -- Margaret Atwood
>
>
>
> *From: *dimitris
> *Sent: *Friday, January 31, 2020 1:23 PM
> *To: *clo...@googlegroups.com
> *Subject: *Re: Feedback on datafy/nav project
>
>
>
> Ok, thanks a million Alex
>
>
>
> On 31/01/2020 21:13,
nuary 31, 2020 1:23 PM
*To: *clojure@googlegroups.com <mailto:clojure@googlegroups.com>
*Subject: *Re: Feedback on datafy/nav project
Ok, thanks a million Alex
On 31/01/2020 21:13, Alex Miller wrote:
Datafiable is not special, the guidelines (recently refreshed with
Rich's input
;re not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood
From: dimitris
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2020 1:23 PM
To: clojure@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Feedback on datafy/nav project
Ok, thanks a million Alex
On 31/01/2020 21:13, Alex Miller wrote:
Datafiable is not special, the guidelines (recently refreshed wi
iew -- http://corfield.org/
"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood
*From: *dimitris <mailto:jimpil1...@gmail.com>
*Sent: *Thursday, January 30, 2020 9:58 AM
*To: *clojure@googlegroups.com <mailto:clojure@go
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
>
> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> -- Margaret Atwood
>
>
>
> *From: *dimitris
> *Sent: *Thursday, January 30, 2020 9:58 AM
> *To: *clojure@googlegroups.com
> *Subj
mitris <mailto:jimpil1...@gmail.com>
*Sent: *Thursday, January 30, 2020 9:58 AM
*To: *clojure@googlegroups.com <mailto:clojure@googlegroups.com>
*Subject: *Re: Feedback on datafy/nav project
Well, the official Clojure guidelines are to NOT extend protocols,
unless you own either the pro
;re not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood
From: dimitris
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 9:58 AM
To: clojure@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Feedback on datafy/nav project
Well, the official Clojure guidelines are to NOT extend protocols, unless you
own either the protocol of the type(s) [1].
In p
Hmmm... how would that work? I want datafy to work on java.time objects
- not Clojure maps (as you showed).
On 30/01/2020 18:37, Christian Gonzalez wrote:
I think you could also add some metadata to allow datafy-ing instead
of extending the protocol:
(with-meta {:name "John Doe" :language "u
I think you could also add some metadata to allow datafy-ing instead of
extending the protocol:
(with-meta {:name "John Doe" :language "us"}
{`clojure.core.protocols/datafy (fn [x] ...)})
On Thursday, January 30, 2020 at 10:28:20 AM UTC-8, Jim foo.bar wrote:
>
> Moreover, following the mailing
Moreover, following the mailing discussion linked from the clojure.org
site, leads to the following quote from Rich - about 10 years ago :)
/If a protocol comes with Clojure itself, avoid extending it to types //
//you don't own, especially e.g. java.lang.String and other core Java //
//interfac
Well, the official Clojure guidelines are to NOT extend protocols,
unless you own either the protocol of the type(s) [1].
In particular these lines:/
/
/If you are a library developer, you should not extend if you own
neither the protocol nor the target./
/You should take particular care whe
Is there a reason you’ve mirrored those protocols/implementations rather than
just use Clojure’s built-in versions?
As it stands, your library wouldn’t work with other tooling that builds on
Clojure’s datafy/nav (REBL, for example).
Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://
12 matches
Mail list logo
