Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha 0.6.488 and clj 1.10.0.414

Oh, I mistakenly misread the successful test pass as a merge. Should be available in the next half day or so. (Or just watch https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/pull/36964) On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 3:27:00 PM UTC-6, Sean Corfield wrote: > > Does it take some time for the brew re

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha 0.6.488 and clj 1.10.0.414

Does it take some time for the brew repo to update? I'm getting this: (! 520)-> brew upgrade clojure Error: clojure 1.10.0.411 already installed And brew update says everything is up to date. Sean On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 12:19:03 PM UTC-8, Alex Miller wrote: > > tools.deps.alpha 0.6

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha 0.6.474 and clj 1.10.0.408

This didn't come through in email... On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 1:30:01 PM UTC-8, Alex Miller wrote: > > tools.deps.alpha 0.6.474 and clj 1.10.0.408 are now available. > > Changes: > > * TDEPS-79 , TDEPS-109 >

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha 0.6.480 and clj 1.10.0.411 are now available.

...and nor did this. On Friday, January 4, 2019 at 12:21:55 PM UTC-8, Alex Miller wrote: > > Just a small additional bug fix over the release a couple days ago related > to classifiers. > > Changes: > >- TDEPS-112 >- Exclusions don't exclud

RE: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha 0.5.452 and clj 1.9.0.394

Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood From: clojure@googlegroups.com on behalf of Alex Miller Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 6:00:46 AM To:

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha 0.5.452 and clj 1.9.0.394

On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 1:02:50 PM UTC-5, Sean Corfield wrote: > > Is there anything any of us can do to help speed up work on the Powershell > version of clj/clojure? I’m feeling the lack of it more and more… > Not really, the hold-up is primarily in figuring out the build packaging

RE: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha 0.5.452 and clj 1.9.0.394

Is there anything any of us can do to help speed up work on the Powershell version of clj/clojure? I’m feeling the lack of it more and more… Also, is there anything any of us can do to help get add-lib into a finalized state and merged in? (I went to use it the other day via a SHA and realized

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha 0.5.452 and clj 1.9.0.394

Hi Alex, Thanks for this new release! I just want to point out that for Linux, there is also the `brew install clojure` option via http://linuxbrew.sh/ . Not sure how well spread this tool is, but we've used it successfully to distribute an internal tool to both our Mac and Linux users. Thanks,

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha 0.5.452 and clj 1.9.0.394

Thanks Alex! - Reid On Saturday, September 15, 2018 at 6:36:19 AM UTC-7, Alex Miller wrote: > > Just a small bug fix/enhancement release of these... > > * TDEPS-92 error and > report on unknown alias key > * TDEPS-12

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha 0.5.425, clj 1.9.0.375

Great. Thanks! On Saturday, April 14, 2018 at 5:47:00 PM UTC-7, Alex Miller wrote: > > Yes, you can use a top level setting in your deps.edn file of: > > {:mvn/local-repo "/tmp/m2"} > > > On Saturday, April 14, 2018 at 7:41:34 PM UTC-5, Mark wrote: >> >> Is there an option to specify the director

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha 0.5.425, clj 1.9.0.375

Yes, you can use a top level setting in your deps.edn file of: {:mvn/local-repo "/tmp/m2"} On Saturday, April 14, 2018 at 7:41:34 PM UTC-5, Mark wrote: > > Is there an option to specify the directory for the local deps > repository? I was playing around with deps on AWS lambda and discovered

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha 0.5.425, clj 1.9.0.375

Is there an option to specify the directory for the local deps repository? I was playing around with deps on AWS lambda and discovered that the default directory (I think it's ~/.m2) is read-only. On lambda, the only writable directory is /tmp. On Saturday, April 14, 2018 at 6:01:52 AM UTC-

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha 0.2.167 and cli updates

Oh this looks cool! On Tuesday, October 31, 2017 at 8:21:54 AM UTC-5, Alex Miller wrote: > > tools.deps.alpha 0.2.167 was released on Oct 26th. I have not announced > all interim releases but some of the recent changes include: > >- Overhaul of the provider extension points >- Initial sup

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha 0.2.167 and cli updates

That's a really neat idea, I'll check it out! It would be awesome to make a project usable from both boot and tools.deps. On Sunday, November 12, 2017 at 9:00:18 PM UTC-5, Sean Corfield wrote: > > I promised a few people I would create a Boot task that leveraged > tools.deps.alpha so your depend

RE: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha 0.2.167 and cli updates

I promised a few people I would create a Boot task that leveraged tools.deps.alpha so your dependencies could be external, in deps.edn. I just released an early version of that https://github.com/seancorfield/boot-tools-deps Feedback welcome! It’s tries to be as close to the clj script behavio

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

I considered jline as well, but using it would require mixing it into the classpath, which I did not wish to do. Many have died on the bikeshed of rlwrap vs jline and I've made the decision for now. Changes were made to the clj script yesterday to make it tolerant of rlwrap being unavailable and th

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

Regarding the cross platform nature of rlwrap, at the cost of an extra JVM dependency might it not be better to use jline? http://jline.sourceforge.net/ https://github.com/jline/jline3 I used to use it with clojure many many years ago and it seemed to work quite well... R. On 26 July 2017 at 1

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Steve Miner wrote: > I’ve been using my own launch script that does something similar to the > new clj script. (I’m caching a Leiningen generated classpath.) I had some > bugs when my project directory was copied to another user or machine > because the cached c

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

I’ve been using my own launch script that does something similar to the new clj script. (I’m caching a Leiningen generated classpath.) I had some bugs when my project directory was copied to another user or machine because the cached classpath was not validate in the new environment, particular

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

Just checking this out... Looks really interesting. Might be worth mentioning the rlwrap dependency in the installation instructions: /Users/rick/repos/3rdparty/tools.deps.alpha/src/main/resources/clj: line 106: rlwrap: command not found resolved on a mac with: brew install rlwrap R. On 26 Ju

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Alex Miller wrote: > Dumb question of the day: given that Clojurescript evidently (as I >>> understand) will soon work seamlessly with npm, can (chunks of) this be >>> extended to cljs? E.g. (s/def ::providers (s/keys :opt-un [::npm])) or >>> some such. Note tha

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 at 9:46:55 PM UTC-5, Gregg Reynolds wrote: > > > BTW, minor doc error I think: > > resolve-deps > > Usage: (resolve-args deps-map resolve-args) > Should that be (resolve-deps ...)? > Yes, fixed. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the G

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

On 26 Jul 2017, at 13:53, Alex Miller wrote: > This effort is really about working on the problem of creating JVM classpaths > and was not really intended to extend to cljs. Perhaps it could be (but I'm > not sure where or why that would be useful). If node modules were declared with a type of

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Sean Corfield wrote: > The primary use case for clj initially will be new users or existing users > that want to build a repl-focused project without any real intent to deploy > artifacts > > > > Fair enough. Not convinced clj is very beginner-friendly (compared t

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

> > Dumb question of the day: given that Clojurescript evidently (as I >> understand) will soon work seamlessly with npm, can (chunks of) this be >> extended to cljs? E.g. (s/def ::providers (s/keys :opt-un [::npm])) or >> some such. Note that I ask without understanding. ;) >> > This effort is r

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote: > Looks good - however with the release of Java 9 soon, has there been any > consideration to supporting the module path at all? To me, regardless of > peoples thoughts on jigsaw, releasing a new JVM dependency management tool > now, and not

RE: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

The primary use case for clj initially will be new users or existing users that want to build a repl-focused project without any real intent to deploy artifacts Fair enough. Not convinced clj is very beginner-friendly (compared to Boot – it’s certainly more friendly than Leiningen) but I suspect

RE: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Alex Miller wrote: On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Sean Corfield wrote: Looks very interesting. The manual install works – looking forward to platform installers!   There are some formatting glitches in the

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Alex Miller wrote: > tools.deps.alpha is a new contrib library API for transitive dependency > graph expansion and the creation of classpaths. > > For more information, I would invite you to check out: > > * the README >

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

On 26 Jul 2017, at 2:19, Alex Miller wrote: > There are some additional pieces still to come that will provide installers > for various systems as well. This is still a work in progress but is targeted > for completion along with Clojure 1.9. Looks good - however with the release of Java 9 soon

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Alex Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Sean Corfield wrote: > >> Looks very interesting. The manual install works – looking forward to >> platform installers! >> >> >> >> There are some formatting glitches in the README with nested lists. >> > >

Re: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Sean Corfield wrote: > Looks very interesting. The manual install works – looking forward to > platform installers! > > > > There are some formatting glitches in the README with nested lists. > Don't see it, let me know and I'll fix. > > > Also, this line: > >

RE: [ANN] tools.deps.alpha

Looks very interesting. The manual install works – looking forward to platform installers! There are some formatting glitches in the README with nested lists. Also, this line: Invoke: clj -Porg.clojure=/Users/me/code/clojure/target/classes Looks like it should be: Invoke: clj