On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Mark Derricutt <m...@talios.com> wrote:

> Looks good - however with the release of Java 9 soon, has there been any
> consideration to supporting the module path at all? To me, regardless of
> peoples thoughts on jigsaw, releasing a new JVM dependency management tool
> now, and not supporting it seems wrong.
>
> No, there has been no consideration thus far about modulepath. Our goal
here is to create classpaths for Clojure apps. I think we have a long while
if ever before using modulepaths with Clojure is common. Modules seem
fairly useless to me from a Clojure perspective (perhaps even actively
harmful) - everything about them is about making things less dynamic and
more closed.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to