I'm not native english speaker, so Clojury and Jewel doesn't sound
cute to me. :)
In Slovak we have very rich gramatical system for creating cute words,
even in more levels, so any word in its base form doesn't sound cute
to us.
So, I'm really sorry, I didn't mean it cute way.
On 11/18/08, Paul
I like forj, but after reflecting on that it might be better to simply
use clojure.org.
-m
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.c
2008/11/18 David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- %< ---
> That being said, why can't clojure.org be used for that purpose? If I
> remember correctly, all it takes is some DNS magic, and we have a,
> say, project.clojure.org. Hosted on another physical machine, if need
> be.
>
That gets my vote!
+1
--
+1
On Nov 18, 2008, at 8:27 AM, blackdog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:54:22 -0800 (PST)
> David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm not in favour of slangish derivatives. They're good for code-
>> names, but when you get serious, a silly name is an obstacle.
+1
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:54:22 -0800 (PST)
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not in favour of slangish derivatives. They're good for code-
> names, but when you get serious, a silly name is an obstacle.
>
> First of all, pronunciation descriptors after the name are down-right
> silly.
I'm not in favour of slangish derivatives. They're good for code-
names, but when you get serious, a silly name is an obstacle.
First of all, pronunciation descriptors after the name are down-right
silly. People start making remarks that you sound like a Wikipedia
article.
Moreover, it's hard to
At the risk of sounding like an old fart, I cringe when I hear "Clojury" and
"Jewel" - they are too "cute" (as Rich nicely put it a while back -
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/0351ca20c758b0b3).
I agree with Brian Carper - we should keep it readable so +1 for something
like "clojurefor
Ruby has gems, python has eggs, I guess Clojure could have jewels.
And Clojure could have Clojury of jewels.
So +1 for clojury.
On 11/17/08, Drew Crampsie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> I've finally found some time to start getting the project hosting site
> together, and i need a
Clojury and conj.us are good names, I think.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:47 AM, cwyang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What a great name 'conj' is, for project hosting site name!
> (no shame for self-complement :-) )
>
> user=> (def repository '(proj-foo proj-bar))
> #=(var user/repository)
> user=>
What a great name 'conj' is, for project hosting site name!
(no shame for self-complement :-) )
user=> (def repository '(proj-foo proj-bar))
#=(var user/repository)
user=> (conj repository 'proj-yours)
(proj-yours proj-foo proj-bar)
However, conj.net is already occupied. ;-(
conj.us is avaliable
How about 'conj'?
conj is (1) for 'conj' in Clojure, and (2) for abbrev of 'conjure',
meaning (Conjuring Clojure).
'cons' for lisp, and 'conj' for clojure. :-)
--
Chul-Woong Yang
On Nov 18, 4:52 am, Drew Crampsie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I've finally found some time to start g
+1 for projecture
=
ANGOL
=
-|[EMAIL PROTECTED], =|+^_^X++~_~,@-
"The only thing worse than a hopeless romantic is a hopeful one"
Magbasa bago Mamuna. Mag-isip bago mambatikos
Without Truth there is no Justice,
Without Justice, there is Tyranny
Semper fi
Proof of Desire is
+1 Clojury
-oryNoun: place for, serves for
Sounds best to me.
On Nov 17, 5:23 pm, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- On Mon, 11/17/08, Drew Crampsie wrote:
>
> > - projecture
>
> Nice, because Clojure "sticks out" beyond Java/JVM, besides the other obvious
> meanings
>
> > - pr
--- On Mon, 11/17/08, Drew Crampsie wrote:
> - projecture
Nice, because Clojure "sticks out" beyond Java/JVM, besides the other obvious
meanings
> - proj4cloj
Too hard to say.
> - clojforge, cloforj,
sourceforj?
> - forj
> - clojects
Source code coming out of the cloject; me likey.
>
I'm in favor of something with clojure in it (like clojureforge).
Something simple to spell and pronounce. I'm also in favor of not
forcing code hosting, but providing it as an option.
Paul
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Drew Crampsie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> 2008/11/17 Matt Revelle <
2008/11/17 Matt Revelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Is the project site going to be more similar to the Python package
> index and CLiki or Sourceforge?
The closest analog is common-lisp.net.. which is like sourceforge.
However, I like the idea of an index as well, and building the backend
seems li
On Nov 17, 11:52 am, Drew Crampsie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here are some suggestions so far, but please feel free to chime in
> with your own as well.
What about something made of whole words, like clojureforge? It has
the benefit of discoverability and being pronounceable by the human
tong
+1 for projecture
Vincent
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Other options:
- creatjure?
- featjure?
- cultjure?
All three have low Google search hit counts. I think cultjure is
better suited for discussion forums. Creatjure seems a good place for
our Clojure creatures.
On Nov 17, 2:52 pm, Drew Crampsie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I've f
On Nov 17, 11:52 am, Drew Crampsie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I've finally found some time to start getting the project hosting site
> together, and i need a name.. so lets put it to a vote.
>
> Here are some suggestions so far, but please feel free to chime in
> with your own as
my vote is for projecture or clojects
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
On Nov 17, 2008, at 3:08 PM, "J. McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm liking projecture
+1, at least from those options.
Is the project site going to be more similar to the Python package
index and CLiki or Sourceforge?
I still think keeping the site focused on providing an index of
Despite the fact that I suggested clojury and openjure in the first
place, I think I like clojr, forj, projecture, and clojects, in that
order.
Decisive - that's me!
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:08 PM, J. McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I'm liking projecture
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008
On Nov 17, 2008, at 3:08 PM, J. McConnell wrote:
> I'm liking projecture
And its evil twin anti-site...
conjecture
--Steve
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group,
I'm liking projecture
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Drew Crampsie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> I've finally found some time to start getting the project hosting site
> together, and i need a name.. so lets put it to a vote.
>
> Here are some suggestions so far, but please feel f
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Drew Crampsie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> I've finally found some time to start getting the project hosting site
> together, and i need a name.. so lets put it to a vote.
>
> Here are some suggestions so far, but please feel free to chime in
> with
Hey All,
I've finally found some time to start getting the project hosting site
together, and i need a name.. so lets put it to a vote.
Here are some suggestions so far, but please feel free to chime in
with your own as well.
- projecture
- clojr
- proj4cloj
- clojforge, cloforj,
- forj
-
27 matches
Mail list logo
