On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Jeffrey Straszheim
wrote:
> Well, there is the IO! macro to wrap side effects. This works with the
> transactions mechanism.
Yes, see also (find-doc "!").
> So foo! does show up, but is not followed rigorously.
There is also do- (doall, dorun, doseq, dotimes,
Well, there is the IO! macro to wrap side effects. This works with the
transactions mechanism.
So foo! does show up, but is not followed rigorously.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Kevin Albrecht wrote:
>
> If no one knows of any existing conventions, does anyone have ideas
> for conventions?
If no one knows of any existing conventions, does anyone have ideas
for conventions?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To un
In Scheme, the common scheme used to name functions with side effects
is to append an exclamation mark to the function name. Obviously, the
types of ways in which Clojure abstracts state modifications are more
complicated and complete than Scheme, so maybe a function naming
scheme for Clojure fun
