Re: ICFP 2009 / ICFP 2010

2010-06-13 Thread Eugen Dück
OK, I'm done for this weekend. Here's what I got: * the binary reader * the vm ("interpreted" for now - would like to make a "compiled" vm. still have to think about it, I guess macros would help?) * a graphical visualizer * a controller framework to solve the actual problems The code is surprisi

Re: ICFP 2009 / ICFP 2010

2010-06-13 Thread Eugen Dück
So, I'm done for this weekend. What I have (and put on the blog) * a binary parser * the vm (interpreted, maybe I can turn it into a compiled vm in the coming week? any ideas? macros? have to think about it) * a graphical visualizer * a controller "framework", allows you to solve the actual proble

Re: ICFP 2009 / ICFP 2010

2010-06-12 Thread Michał Marczyk
On 12 June 2010 04:51, Eugen Dück wrote: > I put the first part of my implementation online: > http://read-eval-puke.blogspot.com/2010/06/icfp-2009-orbit-binary-file-reader.html > so anyone who's interested do have a look. Interesting, thanks! > There's one questi

Re: ICFP 2009 / ICFP 2010

2010-06-12 Thread Craig Andera
> There's one question that came up when I implemented this. Is there a > way to get the name of a clojure function, when all I have is the > function object? Is it stored alongside the function? I didn't see any > metadata or anything. Would I really have to reverse lookup the name > in some names

Re: ICFP 2009 / ICFP 2010

2010-06-11 Thread Eugen Dück
ation-wise) crucial bits of last year's contest. > > I put the first part of my implementation > online:http://read-eval-puke.blogspot.com/2010/06/icfp-2009-orbit-binary-fil... > so anyone who's interested do have a look. > > It would be great to see others participatin

ICFP 2009 / ICFP 2010

2010-06-11 Thread Eugen Dück
I plan on doing ICFP 2010 next weekend in clojure (1.1), if the problem is interesting. In preparation, I'm currently doing the (implementation-wise) crucial bits of last year's contest. I put the first part of my implementation online: http://read-eval-puke.blogspot.com/2010/06/icfp-

Re: Anyone planning on using Clojure for ICFP 2009?

2009-06-13 Thread Michael Wood
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Seth wrote: > > So the 12th International Conference on Functional Programming is > coming up soon. A few months before the event a programming contest is > held, typically with very ambitious requirements in a short period of > time (2-3 days). The 2009 contest wi

Re: Anyone planning on using Clojure for ICFP 2009?

2009-06-11 Thread Daniel Lyons
On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Seth wrote: > > So the 12th International Conference on Functional Programming is > coming up soon. A few months before the event a programming contest is > held, typically with very ambitious requirements in a short period of > time (2-3 days). The 2009 contest will

Re: Anyone planning on using Clojure for ICFP 2009?

2009-06-11 Thread Matt Culbreth
tightly restrict the > acceptable languages. I submitted a fair/poor entry in Ruby last year > (team Foognostic). > > I apologize if I've missed the obvious, but is anyone planning on > using Clojure for the contest? > > Link to the ICFP 2009 contest site:http://www.ittc.ku.ed

Anyone planning on using Clojure for ICFP 2009?

2009-06-11 Thread Seth
would be surprised if they tightly restrict the acceptable languages. I submitted a fair/poor entry in Ruby last year (team Foognostic). I apologize if I've missed the obvious, but is anyone planning on using Clojure for the contest? Link to the ICFP 2009 contest site: http://www.ittc.ku.edu

Re: ICFP 2009

2009-06-07 Thread Andrew Wagner
Just an update on this thread - it turns out my wife and I are out of town at a wedding the weekend of the contest this year, so if anyone wants to organize a clojure team, don't depend on me to organize it. Good luck! On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Jason Wolfe wrote: > > I'm interested, altho

Re: ICFP 2009

2009-04-23 Thread Jason Wolfe
I'm interested, although I'm not sure if I'll be around that weekend. I've done quite well in past TopCoder-style contests (where I've had to use Java); it would be fun to do a competition in Clojure. -Jason --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because y

Re: ICFP 2009

2009-04-23 Thread Paul Stadig
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Rich Hickey wrote: > On Apr 23, 8:59 am, Andrew Wagner wrote: > > > Sounds like a fun thing to try. Could someone give a brief > > > description of what would be required in terms of time commitment to > > > participate on a team? (Sadly, spare time is hard to

Re: ICFP 2009

2009-04-23 Thread Rich Hickey
On Apr 23, 8:59 am, Andrew Wagner wrote: > > Sounds like a fun thing to try. Could someone give a brief > > description of what would be required in terms of time commitment to > > participate on a team? (Sadly, spare time is hard to come by...) > > It's just one weekend. As much or as little

Re: ICFP 2009

2009-04-23 Thread Andrew Wagner
> > Sounds like a fun thing to try. Could someone give a brief > description of what would be required in terms of time commitment to > participate on a team? (Sadly, spare time is hard to come by...) > It's just one weekend. As much or as little time as you can commit to for that weekend. --~-

Re: ICFP 2009

2009-04-22 Thread Mark Engelberg
Try your hand at one of the older contests, like this one: http://www.boundvariable.org/task.shtml --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googleg

Re: ICFP 2009

2009-04-22 Thread Victor Rodriguez
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Chouser wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Andrew Wagner > wrote: >> It would be fun to have a team of clojure programmers work on the ICFP '09 >> contest. Has this been done previously? Anybody interested? I'm new to >> clojure and to lisps in genera

Re: ICFP 2009

2009-04-22 Thread Chouser
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Andrew Wagner wrote: > It would be fun to have a team of clojure programmers work on the ICFP '09 > contest. Has this been done previously? Anybody interested? I'm new to > clojure and to lisps in general, but have a pretty good grasp of functional > programming

Re: ICFP 2009

2009-04-22 Thread fft1976
On Apr 22, 4:55 am, Rich Hickey wrote: > > I think it would be great if a Clojure team could have a go. > > Rich Interestingly, in the 11 year history of the ICFP contest, a Lisp variant never won, not even a third prize (unless you consider Dylan a Lisp), and not for lack of trying. http://en

Re: ICFP 2009

2009-04-22 Thread Rich Hickey
On Apr 20, 10:42 pm, Andrew Wagner wrote: > It would be fun to have a team of clojure programmers work on the ICFP '09 > contest. Has this been done previously? Anybody interested? I'm new to > clojure and to lisps in general, but have a pretty good grasp of functional > programming (mostly fro

ICFP 2009

2009-04-20 Thread Andrew Wagner
It would be fun to have a team of clojure programmers work on the ICFP '09 contest. Has this been done previously? Anybody interested? I'm new to clojure and to lisps in general, but have a pretty good grasp of functional programming (mostly from haskell). It would be great fun to work with some mo