Absolutely not true with respect to numeric functions. In JS the behavior
is *defined* in CLJS not defined and may warn or even throw in the future.
On Monday, October 28, 2013, Leif wrote:
> Wow, source maps make things much more pleasant. Time to give
> clojurescript another shot, I think.
>
>
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Leif wrote:
> I was under the impression that clojurescript insulated us from
> javascript's more distasteful behaviors.
>
Such as "turning it on indiscriminately for all web sites instead of using
NoScript will get you hacked"? :)
--
--
You received this mes
Wow, source maps make things much more pleasant. Time to give
clojurescript another shot, I think.
But I was under the impression that clojurescript insulated us from
javascript's more distasteful behaviors. The numeric functions seem to
have the original anything-goes zany semantics. Is the
Great to hear.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Deniz Kurucu wrote:
> Haven't tested source maps before, works perfectly !
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:25 AM, David Nolen wrote:
>
>> Given the source map improvements to ClojureScript, now is a good time to
>> present a newbie friendly guide
Haven't tested source maps before, works perfectly !
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:25 AM, David Nolen wrote:
> Given the source map improvements to ClojureScript, now is a good time to
> present a newbie friendly guide to hacking with ClojureScript. Emphasis on
> no fuss and getting as quickly as p
Thanks that's clearer now. Somehow I understood that output-to was supposed to
be relative to output-dir.
One thing that prevents me to use optimizations :none is that the generated js
are not as straightforward to use as with others optimizations: you need to
manually include some js files (at
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Julien Eluard wrote:
> Compilation is super fast in optimizations :none mode. A dumb change will
> be compiled in below a second. Now the same change in optimizations :simple
> takes 30 s.
> Is that expected? Is it worth my time to investigate that?
>
:simple was
Hi David,
awesome to see all those recent improvements in the ClojureScript compiler!
Thanks for the hard work.
Compilation is super fast in optimizations :none mode. A dumb change will be
compiled in below a second. Now the same change in optimizations :simple takes
30 s.
Is that expected? Is
Given the source map improvements to ClojureScript, now is a good time to
present a newbie friendly guide to hacking with ClojureScript. Emphasis on
no fuss and getting as quickly as possible to productive experimentation:
http://swannodette.github.io/2013/10/27/the-essence-of-clojurescript/
--
