On Dec 5 2008, Luc Prefontaine wrote:
> I feel we will start before Xmas to put together a prototype.
>
> I really want this to come to life because we could use cooperative
> Clojure instances on our bus. This would also
> provide us another form of persistance. Presently we rely on ActiveMq
> qu
We just started to look at the issue. Got late in the user acceptance
tests because of the radiology equipment supplier
is dragging it's feet.
I feel we will start before Xmas to put together a prototype.
I really want this to come to life because we could use cooperative
Clojure instances on our
On Oct 17, 6:01 pm, Luc Prefontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I am not very far from tackling this issue. In our bus messaging system,
> we are using Terracotta with some Java components
> and it's a matter of weeks before we start to investigate how we can
> bridge Clojure and Terracotta.
>
I am not very far from tackling this issue. In our bus messaging system,
we are using Terracotta with some Java components
and it's a matter of weeks before we start to investigate how we can
bridge Clojure and Terracotta.
A customer asked us about some new functionality today and I see a need
to
On Oct 8, 9:59 am, Krzysztof Kliś <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Due to my interest in Erlang and functional programming in general,
> for some time I have been following a blog by Jonas Bonér
> athttp://jonasboner.com/
> This guy is an expert on Terracotta and he managed to cluster JRuby
> and S
Due to my interest in Erlang and functional programming in general,
for some time I have been following a blog by Jonas Bonér at
http://jonasboner.com/
This guy is an expert on Terracotta and he managed to cluster JRuby
and Scala using Terracotta (he described it on his blog). I think it
would be
On Oct 5, 8:20 pm, Krzysztof Kliś <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Rich,
> I know this is an old post, but did you consider using Terracotta
> (http://www.terracotta.org/) for clustering Clojure? It might fit the
> Clojure concurrency model much better than MPI, and you wouldn't have
> to mix
Hello Rich,
I know this is an old post, but did you consider using Terracotta
(http://www.terracotta.org/) for clustering Clojure? It might fit the
Clojure concurrency model much better than MPI, and you wouldn't have
to mix Java with Erlang (or any other external technologies). You can
already cl
