We just started to look at the issue. Got late in the user acceptance tests because of the radiology equipment supplier is dragging it's feet.
I feel we will start before Xmas to put together a prototype. I really want this to come to life because we could use cooperative Clojure instances on our bus. This would also provide us another form of persistance. Presently we rely on ActiveMq queues but to maximize parallelism we need another model and building that from queues would be harder. I'll keep everyone posted. As soon as I can get my hands on it without being interrupted by the current release of our bus we launch this. We are scheduled to go live January 5th so that's why I am struggling and pushing on that other supplier to get his act together. Grrr ! They're big, we're small and we move 1000 times faster. It's frustrating. They need 3 people to do the job of one of us and still they can't turn on a dime like us. Luc On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 10:42 -0800, Jeremy Dunck wrote: > > > On Oct 17, 6:01 pm, Luc Prefontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I am not very far from tackling this issue. In our bus messaging system, > > we are using Terracotta with some Java components > > and it's a matter of weeks before we start to investigate how we can > > bridge Clojure and Terracotta. > > > > A customer asked us about some new functionality today and I see a need > > to fill the Terracotta/Clojure gap > > somehow. > > > > I'll comeback toward the end of November with some proposal. > > Luc, I'm interested. How's it going? > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
