Actually the part on persistent collections not being implemented was
out of date too for the latest release. Fixed now.
I'm actually not sure whether there still are unported collection
functions; if so, there aren't many.
M.
On 16 May 2012 14:35, Michał Marczyk wrote:
> That was out of date.
That was out of date. Fixed now.
Cheers,
M.
On 16 May 2012 07:37, Oded Badt wrote:
> Sorry, meant to quote:
> " :use is not supported "
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 8:36:24 AM UTC+3, Oded Badt wrote:
>>
>> In:
>> https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/wiki/Differences-from-Clojure
>> It
Sorry, meant to quote:
" :use is not supported "
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 8:36:24 AM UTC+3, Oded Badt wrote:
>
> In:
> https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/wiki/Differences-from-Clojure
> It is written than:
> "You must use the :as form of :require "
>
> Does this basically mean there
In:
https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/wiki/Differences-from-Clojure
It is written than:
"You must use the :as form of :require "
Does this basically mean there is no natural way to write a set of
functions and import them globally (with no namespace prefix)?
For example I would like
