Actually the part on persistent collections not being implemented was out of date too for the latest release. Fixed now.
I'm actually not sure whether there still are unported collection functions; if so, there aren't many. M. On 16 May 2012 14:35, Michał Marczyk <michal.marc...@gmail.com> wrote: > That was out of date. Fixed now. > > Cheers, > M. > > > On 16 May 2012 07:37, Oded Badt <odedb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Sorry, meant to quote: >> " :use is not supported " >> >> >> On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 8:36:24 AM UTC+3, Oded Badt wrote: >>> >>> In: >>> https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/wiki/Differences-from-Clojure >>> It is written than: >>> "You must use the :as form of :require " >>> >>> Does this basically mean there is no natural way to write a set of >>> functions and import them globally (with no namespace prefix)? >>> >>> For example I would like to freely use trigonometric functions and >>> mathematical constants in my ClojureScript code: >>> eg: (sin PI) instead of (Math/sin Math/PI) >>> >>> Thanks >>> Oded >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your >> first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
