ember 30, 2014 5:52:14 AM UTC+8, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
>>
>> The Clojure cheat sheet with links to ClojureDocs.org [2] now also links
>> to ClojureDocs.org for things added since Clojure 1.4, because now
>> ClojureDocs.org [1] has been updated to include all of those things. I
:
>
> The Clojure cheat sheet with links to ClojureDocs.org [2] now also links
> to ClojureDocs.org for things added since Clojure 1.4, because now
> ClojureDocs.org [1] has been updated to include all of those things. I
> suspect Zachary Kim, or perhaps several people, deserve a ro
https://github.com/zk/clojuredocs#clojure-version
>
> On Monday, September 29, 2014 2:52:14 PM UTC-7, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
>>
>> The Clojure cheat sheet with links to ClojureDocs.org [2] now also links
>> to ClojureDocs.org for things added since Clojure 1.4, because now
>&g
As usual, the latest Clojure cheat sheets are available at [2]. The
>> version at clojure.org/cheatsheet <http://clojure.org/cheatsheet> will
>> be updated some time to match.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> [1] http://clojuredocs.org
>> [2] http://jafingerhut.github.io
On 29/09/2014 22:52, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
As usual, the latest Clojure cheat sheets are available at [2]. The
version at clojure.org/cheatsheet <http://clojure.org/cheatsheet> will
be updated some time to match.
Andy
[1] http://clojuredocs.org
[2] http://jafingerhut.github.io
Any
jure cheat sheet with links to ClojureDocs.org [2] now also links
> to ClojureDocs.org for things added since Clojure 1.4, because now
> ClojureDocs.org [1] has been updated to include all of those things. I
> suspect Zachary Kim, or perhaps several people, deserve a round of applause
> f
The Clojure cheat sheet with links to ClojureDocs.org [2] now also links to
ClojureDocs.org for things added since Clojure 1.4, because now
ClojureDocs.org [1] has been updated to include all of those things. I
suspect Zachary Kim, or perhaps several people, deserve a round of applause
for all of
lso the Search feature at http://clojuredocs.org is awesome. Personally,
> as a newbie , I find it very helpful, to be able to search and see the
> examples.
>
> I didn't find the same at http://clojure.org/documentation,
> http://clojure.github.io/clojure or at http://clojure
Yes , agree with puzzler .
Also the Search feature at http://clojuredocs.org is awesome. Personally,
as a newbie , I find it very helpful, to be able to search and see the
examples.
I didn't find the same at http://clojure.org/documentation,
http://clojure.github.io/clojure or at
Sometimes, it's also useful to be able to take things out. I keep seeing
people get confused by clojuredocs references to contrib libraries that
have completely different names now.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this
For all but the few functions and macros added to Clojure since 1.3,
ClojureDocs can be as actively maintained as people choose to update it. I
add new facts that come to my attention there every so often, e.g.:
http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/subs
http://clojuredocs.org
link to the original blog posts
> which outline the idea, but are by no means thorough. It would be great to
> get back to having an active documentation repository for community
> contributions.
>
Yep, you are right, I didn't realise The Clojure Cheatsheet[1] is actually
pointing t
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Bruce Wang wrote:
> The official docs is at http://clojure.org/documentation,
> http://clojure.github.io/clojure/
>
>
>
Sure, but the nice thing about clojuredocs is that it includes examples for
most of the functions and for a while, it was updated more frequently
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 21:55:08 -0700
Andy Fingerhut wrote:
> Those who created ClojureDocs.org made some progress towards
> rewriting the server side code in Clojure (it was originally
> developed in Ruby on Rails, IIRC), but have found it challenging to
> find enough time to finish t
Those who created ClojureDocs.org made some progress towards rewriting the
server side code in Clojure (it was originally developed in Ruby on Rails,
IIRC), but have found it challenging to find enough time to finish that
work. I recall a month or two ago someone mentioning that they would be
The official docs is at http://clojure.org/documentation,
http://clojure.github.io/clojure/
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:13 PM, binita wrote:
> Hello everyone ,
>
> Latest version of Clojure is 1.5.
> But, http://clojuredocs.org only show docs for 1.2 and 1.3 versions. How
> ab
Hello everyone ,
Latest version of Clojure is 1.5.
But, http://clojuredocs.org only show docs for 1.2 and 1.3 versions. How
about 1.4 and 1.5 documentation ?
Thanks
Binita
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to
Cedric:
At the bottom of the main clojuredocs.org page is the text below. I've copied
it here because perhaps the best way to get such changes made is to contribute
changes to the code of the clojuredocs.org web site. At the least, it would be
good to open a case. You'll have to
eate a free account on clojuredocs.org and edit away. Instant gratification
:-) Because of this, you do need to take the examples there with a critical
eye, but on average they are quite good.
Convince a Clojure contributor to make changes to doc strings, or to the docs
hosted on clojure.org. The
Done.
On Feb 27, 10:00 am, Brian Marick wrote:
> On Feb 27, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
>
> > Thanks to several people who provided feedback, especially Steve Miner, and
> > to Alex Miller for updating the web site yet again, there is a new
> > cheatsheet at:
>
> >http://clojure.org
All of the links now point to clojuredocs, where anyone can add
examples.
I'm not sure where Andy hosts the latex source and code to generate
everything for the cheatsheet contents?
On Feb 27, 7:57 am, Bill Caputo wrote:
> On Feb 27, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
>
> > Thanks to seve
That's part of the site-wide template - afaik only the Organizer roles
(not me) have the ability to change it. Those people are: Rich, Stu,
Tom Hickey, and Chris Redinger.
On Feb 15, 3:45 pm, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> Andy Fingerhut writes:
> > Fogus, Alex Millier, and I have made some updates to
On Feb 27, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
> Thanks to several people who provided feedback, especially Steve Miner, and
> to Alex Miller for updating the web site yet again, there is a new cheatsheet
> at:
>
> http://clojure.org/cheatsheet
Excellent. Might be helpful to put 1.3 in th
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Bill Caputo wrote:
> This is fantastic guys... thank you.
Agreed.
Particularly, you can see syntax-highlighted source in the same page
now. Previously, if you clicked through to a function and clicked
through to the source, it sent you to a github page that (usua
On Feb 27, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
> Thanks to several people who provided feedback, especially Steve Miner, and
> to Alex Miller for updating the web site yet again, there is a new cheatsheet
> at:
This is fantastic guys... thank you. One question: if one wants to help out
wi
early February, 2012, but here are the main ones:
+ New today: most links on the page now go to the documentation on
clojuredocs.org. These pages have not only the documentation that the old
links had, but also one click to see the source code of the function, and very
often user-contributed
ge.mac.com/jafingerhut/files/cheatsheet-clj-1.3.0-v1.2/cheats
>> heet-full.html
>>
>> with links to clojuredocs.org:
>>
>> http://homepage.mac.com/jafingerhut/files/cheatsheet-clj-1.3.0-v1.2/cheats
>> heet-clojuredocs.html
>
> Andy,
>
> Thanks for
links to docs on clojure.org:
http://homepage.mac.com/jafingerhut/files/cheatsheet-clj-1.3.0-v1.2/cheatsheet-full.html
with links to clojuredocs.org:
http://homepage.mac.com/jafingerhut/files/cheatsheet-clj-1.3.0-v1.2/cheatsheet-clojuredocs.html
Note: clojuredocs.org documentation for disj
Andy Fingerhut writes:
> Fogus, Alex Millier, and I have made some updates to the Clojure
> cheatsheet for Clojure 1.3.0:
>
> http://clojure.org/cheatsheet
Looks good. I did notice the copyright date in the footer is wrong though.
-Phil
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
re.org/cheatsheet
>>
>> The links there go to the generated documentation on clojure.github.com.
>> Below is a version that is the same as the one above, except that its links
>> go to the appropriate page on clojuredocs.org. All of those have the
>> documentation st
ure cheatsheet
> for Clojure 1.3.0:
>
> http://clojure.org/cheatsheet
>
> The links there go to the generated documentation on clojure.github.com.
> Below is a version that is the same as the one above, except that its links
> go to the appropriate page on clojuredocs.org
above, except that its links go to the
appropriate page on clojuredocs.org. All of those have the documentation
string and a link to the source, and many of them also show examples of their
use. I can't vouch for the correctness of all of the examples, but anyone is
welcome to improve th
appropriate page on clojuredocs.org. All of those have the documentation
string and a link to the source, and many of them also show examples of their
use. I can't vouch for the correctness of all of the examples, but anyone is
welcome to improve them by creating a free account on that site and ed
One of the most important things for me is the access to code
examples. Every example could be split in multiple parts. (comment,
function and result part for example)
Editors (Emacs + Slime) could display these in a nicely and decent
manner while developing.
Also, bulk-get could be helpful (to ma
On Sep 3, 2:11 am, Lee Hinman wrote:
> working on the API for ClojureDocs.org in the coming future. I was
> hoping to get some feedback regarding what people wanted to see for an
> API for ClojureDocs:
> Any other feedback is highly appreciated :)
when i added examples, i thinked
jure.
My vote is on JSON.
On Sep 2, 6:11 pm, Lee Hinman wrote:
> Hi All,
> As Zach announced in the ClojureDocs mailing list [1], I'm going to be
> working on the API for ClojureDocs.org in the coming future. I was
> hoping to get some feedback regarding what people wanted to see for
Hi All,
As Zach announced in the ClojureDocs mailing list [1], I'm going to be
working on the API for ClojureDocs.org in the coming future. I was
hoping to get some feedback regarding what people wanted to see for an
API for ClojureDocs:
- What kind of features would you like to see i
seems to make all the doc strings I've encountered in the wild
> format up pretty well.
>
> HTH,
>
> Tom
>
> On Jul 17, 2:52 am, Tassilo Horn wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Zack,
>
> > I just had a look at ClojureDocs.org and it's really neat!
>
gt;
> I just had a look at ClojureDocs.org and it's really neat!
>
> Some observations I made:
>
> - When I view the docs of let's say clojure.set/rename, the clojure.set
> part is a link. But instead of pointing to to clojure.set summary
> page, it is only http:.
>
Hi Zack,
I just had a look at ClojureDocs.org and it's really neat!
Some observations I made:
- When I view the docs of let's say clojure.set/rename, the clojure.set
part is a link. But instead of pointing to to clojure.set summary
page, it is only http:.
- In the source sectio
Islon- See the week 1 post on the CD.org group (http://
groups.google.com/group/clojuredocsorg/browse_thread/thread/
af7edbf85a6607c4) as to where this fits in on the timeline.
Lee- Very cool, I've added it to the UserVoice page.
Daniel- I agree, a great search experience is key for documentation
Hi All-
I've just posted a summary of feedback and the plan moving forward for
ClojureDocs.org (http://groups.google.com/group/clojuredocsorg/
browse_thread/thread/af7edbf85a6607c4). If you're interested in being
involved in shaping the site please take a look (and sign up for the
gr
A few thoughts... It might be interesting to allow examples to be
rated. Quality or usefulness of the provided example could then be
inferred from the rating and highly rated examples could bubble to the
top or have the associated rating prominently shown.
~A
On Jul 16, 10:29 am, Lee Hinman wro
Hi Zack,
I just take a quick look at your site and must say that I'm impressed.
This is going to become one of the utilities I constantly keep open in
the background while developing. Especially since features like the
Var cross-referencing tend to make easier to get the "big picture".
One thing
Had another suggestion,
As an example contributor, It would be really nice to see a list of
functions that have no examples yet at a glance, so if I wanted to
work on adding examples I could go through a list and work on
functions that have no examples. I believe the clojure-examples
appspot wiki
Hi.
Does clojuredocs expose any external API (json, xml... rest,
webservices, etc) so I can access the docs from my code?
Islon
On Jul 13, 11:40 pm, j-g-faustus wrote:
> On Jul 13, 8:37 pm, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> > Can I suggest omitting the "Table of contents" sidebar when printing?
> > I've n
On Jul 13, 8:37 pm, Paul Moore wrote:
> Can I suggest omitting the "Table of contents" sidebar when printing?
> I've not tried printing the document to see how it looks, but removing
> the sidebar would be an essential starting point...
Why would anyone want to print it?
I occasionally print lon
On 11 July 2010 12:05, Lukasz Urbanek wrote:
> Looks very nice!
>
> Hoping for the categories to arrive to the core namespace. This really
> saves a lot of time for a clojure beginner like me.
+1
> Additionally, I'd prefer if the source was wasn't exposed by default
> (It's quite distracting whe
Hi,
Am 13.07.2010 um 14:26 schrieb j-g-faustus:
>>> I made my own cheat sheet for private use over the past month or so,
>>> core functions only. It's at the 80% stage, I don't expect it will
>>> ever be 100%, but I have found it useful:
>>> http://faustus.webatu.com/clj-quick-ref.html
Some comm
I agree. The in-code function documentation serves its purpose but
could be improved upon in a medium where space is at less of a
premium.
Bill Smith
Austin, TX
On Jul 10, 12:36 pm, James Reeves wrote:
> On 10 July 2010 15:06, Stuart Halloway wrote:
>
> > (6) Because docstrings are designed f
On 12 July 2010 23:25, j-g-faustus wrote:
> The site looks very nice, I especially like the "find real world
> examples" functionality and the fact that it collects documentation
> for common non-core libraries as well.
>
> I made my own cheat sheet for private use over the past month or so,
> cor
On 13 Jul, 01:28, j-g-faustus wrote:
> On Jul 13, 12:25 am, j-g-faustus wrote:
>
> > I made my own cheat sheet for private use over the past month or so,
> > core functions only. It's at the 80% stage, I don't expect it will
> > ever be 100%, but I have found it useful:
> > http://faustus.webatu.
On Jul 13, 12:25 am, j-g-faustus wrote:
> I made my own cheat sheet for private use over the past month or so,
> core functions only. It's at the 80% stage, I don't expect it will
> ever be 100%, but I have found it useful:
> http://faustus.webatu.com/clj-quick-ref.html
Looks like the hosting pro
The site looks very nice, I especially like the "find real world
examples" functionality and the fact that it collects documentation
for common non-core libraries as well.
I made my own cheat sheet for private use over the past month or so,
core functions only. It's at the 80% stage, I don't expec
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 4:10 PM, zkim wrote:
> If you're willing to continue the discussion, I'd like to keep this
> going (maybe another thread?). As I'm writing this I'm getting the
> feeling that I'm not quite articulating my thoughts well, and I think
> further discussion will help me to fles
As a Clojure novice I'm happy to see the documentation side of the
Clojure ecosystem growing regardless of the stack used for a doc site.
Having a resource like a user-edited php.net will be a great help. I
am excited about submitting a few examples of my own.
On Jul 11, 9:14 am, Phil Hagelberg w
We use Rails for all our GUIs,
we need simple CRUD most of
the time and we ActiveScaffold.
Most of our controllers are less than
70 lines and we seldom write forms.
We use the ActiveScaffold partial
forms almost every were sometimes
custpmizing them.
Clojure Web Frameworks are not
there yet.
We
Rich-
> It sounded to me like he was only saying that he's more familiar with
> Ruby/Rails than he is with Clojure.
Correct. I think it was a fair question, and I'm happy to provide
insights into my decision making process.
-Zack
On Jul 11, 12:37 pm, Richard Lyman wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 201
Lukasz-
> Hoping for the categories to arrive to the core namespace. This really
> saves a lot of time for a clojure beginner like me.
The way Justin did this is great (http://clojure-examples.appspot.com/
clojure.core). I'm hoping to add this in the near future.
> Additionally, I'd prefer if th
Phil-
A little background on my clojure web experience: I've got a intranet
web tool written using ring / enlive / moustache (system health /
monitoring for a personal project) as well as dabbled in compojure
before the 0.4.0 rev, and more recently I've been looking at sandbar /
carte. The timefra
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 11:23 PM, zkim wrote:
>>> but what do you think about using Justin's codebase, or an Aleph-based
>>> server to
>>> host the thing instead of Ruby/Rails? (see the link above for more details)
>>
>> I'm inclined to mo
Looks very nice!
Hoping for the categories to arrive to the core namespace. This really
saves a lot of time for a clojure beginner like me.
Additionally, I'd prefer if the source was wasn't exposed by default
(It's quite distracting when one is looking for the examples), some
kind of "source" but
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 11:23 PM, zkim wrote:
>> but what do you think about using Justin's codebase, or an Aleph-based
>> server to
>> host the thing instead of Ruby/Rails? (see the link above for more details)
>
> I'm inclined to move forward with the Ruby / Rails for now. The
> reason I went
ted to taking whatever measures
are necessary to ensure that the hard work that went into adding
content to the site would not be lost. I'll start a thread over at
the clojuredocs.org group to discuss this.
> Because docstrings are designed for consumption at a REPL,
> they may in
Shantanu-
> One suggestion -- consider providing a downloadable
> bundle for offline use as well.
I believe there's an item up on the UserVoice page (http://
clojuredocs.uservoice.com/) keep an eye out for updates and comments
there.
-Zack
On Jul 10, 3:29 am, Shantanu Kumar wrote:
> This is g
egorization suggestions you have for your lib. Ultimately I'd
like to get clojuredocs.org to the point where you can enter a repo
url into a web form and click 'add / update' (or maybe some code that
watches a repo for updates).
On Jul 10, 3:11 am, "Heinz N. Gies" wro
y/Rails? (see the link
> above for more details)
>
> On Jul 9, 2010, at 7:05 PM, Justin Kramer wrote:
>
>
>
> > An "examples" function for the REPL that pulls from the wiki:
>
> >http://gist.github.com/470031
>
> > I'm sure something like it could be
> http://gist.github.com/470031
>
> I'm sure something like it could be made for ClojureDocs.org once the
> API is in place.
Nice, looks pretty straightforward.
> I think an important aspect of a
> collaborative tool like this is quality control. To that end, a
> compl
Zack if you need help with this Rail
app let us now. We can give you a
hand, the wish list keeps growing :)))
Luc P.
Sent from my iPod
On 2010-07-09, at 15:07, zkim wrote:
Hi Justin, thanks again for the go-ahead to pull examples from
http://clojure-examples.appspot.com.
Zack, you had me
On 10 July 2010 15:06, Stuart Halloway wrote:
> (6) Because docstrings are designed for consumption at a REPL, they may in
> some cases presume a fixed font. Worth considering for display on the site.
What about giving function documentation the same "wiki" behaviour
that the examples have? Star
://clojuredocs.org looks good on this
front. Stick to it.
(2) +1 on hiding private APIs. We use private APIs carefully and deliberately
in Clojure, and I would hate to facilitate people writing code that will break
later.
(3) +1 on making it very easy to see which version of an API you are looking
at
On 9 July 2010 21:06, Tom Faulhaber wrote:
> Quick thought: You probably don't want to include private vars.
Seconded. It's a little confusing seeing private vars and macros in
the API docs!
Other than that, this looks excellent. I'm signing up as I write this.
- James
--
You received this me
en time. So I took a whack at
> the problem, and came up withhttp://clojuredocs.org. It's a site
> that (I'm hoping) will fill this need by providing a centralized
> examples database, along with solid search capabilities across both
> core and third party libraries (core being
This is great. One suggestion -- consider providing a downloadable
bundle for offline use as well.
Regards,
Shantanu
On Jul 10, 2:11 pm, "Heinz N. Gies" wrote:
> Hi Zack,
> first of all, great effort there :) having a place for clojure docs is
> awesome. Two things come to mind:
>
> 1)http://gi
Hi Zack,
first of all, great effort there :) having a place for clojure docs is awesome.
Two things come to mind:
1) http://github.com/defn/walton - have a look at it, it might be a good way to
fetch examples for functions where none are provided yet.
2) Will it be possible to put other 3rd par
Hi,
Am 09.07.2010 um 23:47 schrieb zkim:
> I kind of went back and forth on this. Originally I only parsed out
> public vars, but in a couple of instances I found that when tracing
> through some code I would hit on private vars.
I'm suspicious of showing source code to the reader with everythi
Rails? (see the link above
for more details)
On Jul 9, 2010, at 7:05 PM, Justin Kramer wrote:
> An "examples" function for the REPL that pulls from the wiki:
>
> http://gist.github.com/470031
>
> I'm sure something like it could be made for ClojureDocs.org on
An "examples" function for the REPL that pulls from the wiki:
http://gist.github.com/470031
I'm sure something like it could be made for ClojureDocs.org once the
API is in place.
General comments on ClojureDocs.org: I think an important aspect of a
collaborative tool like
was a lack of examples specific to the individual functions I was
> > trying to wrap my head around at any given time. So I took a whack at
> > the problem, and came up withhttp://clojuredocs.org. It's a site
> > that (I'm hoping) will fill this need by providing a centra
functions I was
> trying to wrap my head around at any given time. So I took a whack at
> the problem, and came up withhttp://clojuredocs.org. It's a site
> that (I'm hoping) will fill this need by providing a centralized
> examples database, along with solid search capabilitie
On 9 July 2010 09:32, zkim wrote:
>
> Questions / thoughts?
>
>
Looks really good to me. Could you display the version numbers for Clojure
and the libraries that the site covers?
Gavin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to thi
Hi Justin, thanks again for the go-ahead to pull examples from
http://clojure-examples.appspot.com.
> Zack, you had mentioned you planned to keep the source of your site
> proprietary -- is that set in stone?
Definitely not set in stone. As far as the site goes there's not much
Clojure going on
I've put these suggestions up on the UserVoice page, I believe I got
all of them, but if I missed yours please add it yourself or let me
know.
Dimitri: I share your frustrations with having to remember yet another
login / password. Other than minor cosmetic fixes, improving the user
signup / login
Thanks all for your kind words. As to the specifics:
> The headers for each section (Doc, Source, Example(s)) don't
> differentiate themselves from the regular doc text enough, maybe
> bold/underline/color them to make them show up more?
I'd agree, I think the visual styling of the page will cha
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:32 AM, zkim wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Questions / thoughts?
>
> -Zack
Hi Zack,
First off, I think it looks great, and it definitely seems useful when
trying to find an example of a particular API call.
Few suggestions:
1. The headers for each section (Doc, Source, Example(s))
k a whack at
> the problem, and came up withhttp://clojuredocs.org. It's a site
> that (I'm hoping) will fill this need by providing a centralized
> examples database, along with solid search capabilities across both
> core and third party libraries (core being the focus).
>
> I
I've told Zack that he is free to pull any examples from the wiki for
use on his site.
I don't know about collaboration beyond that. The wiki is open source
and written in Clojure; anyone is free to contribute/fork. At least
one person has expressed interest in making code contributions.
Zack, yo
nguage
> was a lack of examples specific to the individual functions I was
> trying to wrap my head around at any given time. So I took a whack at
> the problem, and came up withhttp://clojuredocs.org. It's a site
> that (I'm hoping) will fill this need by providing a centralized
any given time. So I took a whack at
> the problem, and came up withhttp://clojuredocs.org. It's a site
> that (I'm hoping) will fill this need by providing a centralized
> examples database, along with solid search capabilities across both
> core and third party libraries (core being the
Having contributed a lot of examples to clojure-examples.appspot.com
this week, I agree that it would be a shame to duplicate efforts.
On Jul 9, 11:21 am, David Nolen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:32 AM, zkim wrote:
>
> > Questions / thoughts?
>
> > -Zack
>
> This is great. I think the main
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:32 AM, zkim wrote:
>
> Questions / thoughts?
>
> -Zack
This is great. I think the main thing is not duplicating effort. This and
clojure-examples.appspot.com should really join forces.
David
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:32 AM, zkim wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Questions / thoughts?
>
> -Zack
Hi Zack,
First off, I think it looks great, and it definitely seems useful when
trying to find an example of a particular API call.
Few suggestions:
1. The headers for each section (Doc, Source, Example(s))
took a whack at
> the problem, and came up with http://clojuredocs.org. It's a site
> that (I'm hoping) will fill this need by providing a centralized
> examples database, along with solid search capabilities across both
> core and third party libraries (core being the focus).
&
arning the language
was a lack of examples specific to the individual functions I was
trying to wrap my head around at any given time. So I took a whack at
the problem, and came up with http://clojuredocs.org. It's a site
that (I'm hoping) will fill this need by providing a centralized
exam
94 matches
Mail list logo
