On Apr 28, 10:06 pm, dmiller wrote:
> Startup times have crept up slowly with some of the recent changes in
> the compiler. I have a plan to simplify the loading process. I've
> been avoiding making too many ancillary changes in the compiler while
> I've been porting all the compiler changes th
You're brave being on the new2 branch. It's pretty raw development in
there. The current commit is okay, I try to mark the interim ones.
Yes, the CLR2 symbol needs to be defined. That flag became necessary
when they made some incompatible namespace changes in the DLR to
accommodate CLR 2 verus C
Defining CLR2 in release on the new2 branch allowed me to compile
without issue.
I still have the several second delay, and from what little I kind
find around I suppose that is typical. Is that correct? Is there any
way to bring that down?
Thank you,
Joerthan
On Apr 23, 9:45 pm, dmiller wrote:
I haven't compiled under a release in a while. Recent changes to the
build system may have messed it up. I'll check it out.
David
On Apr 23, 2:11 am, Joerthan Panest wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am considering ClojureCLR for embedding in an application, but it appears
> as though it takes ~4secs to
Hello,
I am considering ClojureCLR for embedding in an application, but it appears
as though it takes ~4secs to start up. Is this typical? Is there a way to
speed up? I realize that this could be hidden by opening it in a background
process and leaving it open but I can see where that is less than
