You're brave being on the new2 branch. It's pretty raw development in there. The current commit is okay, I try to mark the interim ones.
Yes, the CLR2 symbol needs to be defined. That flag became necessary when they made some incompatible namespace changes in the DLR to accommodate CLR 2 verus CLR 4. I'll go back into the builds and make sure it is there for the release builds. Startup times have crept up slowly with some of the recent changes in the compiler. I have a plan to simplify the loading process. I've been avoiding making too many ancillary changes in the compiler while I've been porting all the compiler changes that went into the 'new' work on the JVM version. I'll put startup time improvement next in the queue. -David On Apr 28, 2:28 pm, Joerthan Panest <joerthan.pan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Defining CLR2 in release on the new2 branch allowed me to compile > without issue. > > I still have the several second delay, and from what little I kind > find around I suppose that is typical. Is that correct? Is there any > way to bring that down? > > Thank you, > Joerthan > > On Apr 23, 9:45 pm, dmiller <dmiller2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I haven't compiled under a release in a while. Recent changes to the > > build system may have messed it up. I'll check it out. > > > David > > > On Apr 23, 2:11 am, Joerthan Panest <joerthan.pan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I am considering ClojureCLR for embedding in an application, but it > > > appears > > > as though it takes ~4secs to start up. Is this typical? Is there a way to > > > speed up? I realize that this could be hidden by opening it in a > > > background > > > process and leaving it open but I can see where that is less than ideal in > > > some situations. > > > > I also noticed that the current development environment has many > > > references > > > to Debug bin settings and a short attempt to get it in Release mode failed > > > with a number of errors. Is this due to the nature of the required > > > run-time > > > information or simply because it is still a Beta? > > > > Thank you, > > > Joerthan > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > > > your first post. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > > your first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
