Re: Clojure Robustness

2008-09-04 Thread Stuart Sierra
On Sep 3, 11:53 am, noahr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any opinions on whether Clojure is solid enough to be used in actual > production systems? I have ~1000 lines of Clojure code at work (plus many more I'm no longer using), not exactly "production" but in regular use for batch jobs. The only

Re: Clojure Robustness

2008-09-03 Thread Allen Rohner
> Any opinions on whether Clojure is solid enough to be used in actual > production systems? I have no data yet, but I'm planning on putting a webapp on the web using compojure just as soon as it's ready. Allen --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message beca

Re: Clojure Robustness

2008-09-03 Thread Chouser
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 11:53 AM, noahr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any opinions on whether Clojure is solid enough to be used in actual > production systems? So far, I've mostly used Clojure where I would have used a python, perl, or ruby script in the past. So far, that's only amounted to a

Re: Clojure Robustness

2008-09-03 Thread Chas Emerick
We've not gone to production with Clojure code yet, but that day is fast approaching. Every indication is that it's "ready for prime time", at least in our circumstances. And yes, being able to drop back into Java is a nice escape hatch to have (although we've only employed it once in a very con

Re: Clojure Robustness

2008-09-03 Thread Matt Revelle
Chas, Did that edge case ever come up on the list? If not, would you mind sharing now? -Matt On Sep 3, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Chas Emerick wrote: > > We've not gone to production with Clojure code yet, but that day is > fast approaching. Every indication is that it's "ready for prime > time", a

Clojure Robustness

2008-09-03 Thread noahr
Any opinions on whether Clojure is solid enough to be used in actual production systems? Obviously it's JVM based, which is, and hopefully any issues would be caught per normal testing, and fixed or worked- around, but wondering what general thoughts on the matter are. As a backup plan I figure lo