Chas, Did that edge case ever come up on the list? If not, would you mind sharing now?
-Matt On Sep 3, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Chas Emerick wrote: > > We've not gone to production with Clojure code yet, but that day is > fast approaching. Every indication is that it's "ready for prime > time", at least in our circumstances. And yes, being able to drop > back into Java is a nice escape hatch to have (although we've only > employed it once in a very constrained edge case that frankly was > caused by my misuse of a particular clojure data structure). > > - Chas > > On Sep 3, 11:53 am, noahr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Any opinions on whether Clojure is solid enough to be used in actual >> production systems? Obviously it's JVM based, which is, and hopefully >> any issues would be caught per normal testing, and fixed or worked- >> around, but wondering what general thoughts on the matter are. As a >> backup plan I figure logic could always be shifted more towards Java >> if necessary. >> >> --n > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
