Re: Clojure 1.2: Readsyntax for meta information

2010-05-17 Thread Laurent PETIT
2010/5/17 Stefan Kamphausen : > Salut, > > On 17 Mai, 18:12, Laurent PETIT wrote: >> 2010/5/17 Meikel Brandmeyer : >> >> > Hi, >> >> > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 08:21:39AM -0700, Stefan Kamphausen wrote: >> >> >> is it correct to assume that the usual read-syntax for 1.2 will be ^ >> >> instead of #

Re: Clojure 1.2: Readsyntax for meta information

2010-05-17 Thread Stefan Kamphausen
Salut, On 17 Mai, 18:12, Laurent PETIT wrote: > 2010/5/17 Meikel Brandmeyer : > > > Hi, > > > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 08:21:39AM -0700, Stefan Kamphausen wrote: > > >> is it correct to assume that the usual read-syntax for 1.2 will be ^ > >> instead of #^?  Will all printers emit that? Will #^ be

Re: Clojure 1.2: Readsyntax for meta information

2010-05-17 Thread Meikel Brandmeyer
Hi, On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:18:15AM -0700, ataggart wrote: > Not quite. Wow. I'm really disconnected from 1.2. :( Please ignore me concerning 1.2 questions. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group,

Re: Clojure 1.2: Readsyntax for meta information

2010-05-17 Thread ataggart
Not quite. Syntax Before: meta: ^ type-hint: #^ Syntax After: meta: none, use meta type-hint: ^ It's already in place on 1.2: user=> (set! *warn-on-reflection* true) true user=> (defn foo [x] (.longValue x)) Reflection warning, NO_SOURCE_PATH:6 - reference to field longValue can't be resolved

Re: Clojure 1.2: Readsyntax for meta information

2010-05-17 Thread Laurent PETIT
2010/5/17 Meikel Brandmeyer : > Hi, > > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 08:21:39AM -0700, Stefan Kamphausen wrote: > >> is it correct to assume that the usual read-syntax for 1.2 will be ^ >> instead of #^?  Will all printers emit that? Will #^ become >> deprecated? > > No. They are not equivalent and ^ is

Re: Clojure 1.2: Readsyntax for meta information

2010-05-17 Thread Meikel Brandmeyer
Hi, On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 08:21:39AM -0700, Stefan Kamphausen wrote: > is it correct to assume that the usual read-syntax for 1.2 will be ^ > instead of #^? Will all printers emit that? Will #^ become > deprecated? No. They are not equivalent and ^ is deprecated. #^ will remain doing what it

Clojure 1.2: Readsyntax for meta information

2010-05-17 Thread Stefan Kamphausen
Hi, is it correct to assume that the usual read-syntax for 1.2 will be ^ instead of #^? Will all printers emit that? Will #^ become deprecated? Unfortunately I didn't find a enlightening ticket on assembla and no information on the devel list, just the commit message ("^ does what #^ does, reade