2010/5/17 Stefan Kamphausen <ska2...@googlemail.com>:
> Salut,
>
> On 17 Mai, 18:12, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2010/5/17 Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de>:
>>
>> > Hi,
>>
>> > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 08:21:39AM -0700, Stefan Kamphausen wrote:
>>
>> >> is it correct to assume that the usual read-syntax for 1.2 will be ^
>> >> instead of #^?  Will all printers emit that? Will #^ become
>> >> deprecated?
>>
>> > No. They are not equivalent and ^ is deprecated. #^ will remain doing
>> > what it did up to now. ^ will go away w/o replacement.
>>
>> Sorry to disagree, but the most recent changes I know about it (less
>> than one month ago) are (in 1.2):
>>
>>   * the old behaviour of ^ will not be supported anymore (and users
>> will just have to use calls to meta)
>>   * and will be replaced by the current behaviour of #^
>>   * #^ remains but becomes deprecated
>
> that sounds like a citation.  Is it?  If so, what's the source?  Will
> #^ become deprecated in 1.2 or in the following release? And, are
> there any plans for the future beyond 1.2++?


It's just what I personally know, from having followed things on
#clojure, and also from reading the recent clojure.io patch from Stu
Halloway where what I described above is applied.

I've already made the relative change in counterclockwise syntax
coloring, as Rich stated in #clojure. He also gave a "go" to a clojure
book author for doing the appropriate semantics modifications in the
corresponding chapters.

So yes, I'm pretty sure this will be as I described for 1.2.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to