2010/5/17 Stefan Kamphausen <ska2...@googlemail.com>: > Salut, > > On 17 Mai, 18:12, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2010/5/17 Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de>: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 08:21:39AM -0700, Stefan Kamphausen wrote: >> >> >> is it correct to assume that the usual read-syntax for 1.2 will be ^ >> >> instead of #^? Will all printers emit that? Will #^ become >> >> deprecated? >> >> > No. They are not equivalent and ^ is deprecated. #^ will remain doing >> > what it did up to now. ^ will go away w/o replacement. >> >> Sorry to disagree, but the most recent changes I know about it (less >> than one month ago) are (in 1.2): >> >> * the old behaviour of ^ will not be supported anymore (and users >> will just have to use calls to meta) >> * and will be replaced by the current behaviour of #^ >> * #^ remains but becomes deprecated > > that sounds like a citation. Is it? If so, what's the source? Will > #^ become deprecated in 1.2 or in the following release? And, are > there any plans for the future beyond 1.2++?
It's just what I personally know, from having followed things on #clojure, and also from reading the recent clojure.io patch from Stu Halloway where what I described above is applied. I've already made the relative change in counterclockwise syntax coloring, as Rich stated in #clojure. He also gave a "go" to a clojure book author for doing the appropriate semantics modifications in the corresponding chapters. So yes, I'm pretty sure this will be as I described for 1.2. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
