Re: Clojure-mode + aquamacs + paredit and character literals

2012-03-22 Thread László Török
I'm on OS X 10.6.8 with latest stable Aquamacs and https://github.com/overtone/live-coding-emacs. Worked out of the box and is the most amazing visual experience and programmer productivity I had with Emacs so far. Las 2012/3/22 Moritz Ulrich > Do you really need Aquamacs? My experience is tha

Re: Clojure-mode + aquamacs + paredit and character literals

2012-03-22 Thread JuanManuel Gimeno Illa
Thanks, I'll give it a try. Juan Manuel On Thursday, March 22, 2012 4:21:19 PM UTC+1, Moritz Ulrich wrote: > > Do you really need Aquamacs? My experience is that it causes more > trouble than it's worth. > > I'd recommend using vanilla Emacs from [1] or building from source > with the --cocoa swi

Re: Clojure-mode + aquamacs + paredit and character literals

2012-03-22 Thread Moritz Ulrich
Do you really need Aquamacs? My experience is that it causes more trouble than it's worth. I'd recommend using vanilla Emacs from [1] or building from source with the --cocoa switch. Vanilla Emacs on OS X got so good you don't really need Aquamacs anymore. Looking at the Emacs Starter Kit from Phi

Clojure-mode + aquamacs + paredit and character literals

2012-03-21 Thread JuanManuel Gimeno Illa
I'm having problems typing character literals in aquamacs when clojure-mode and paredit are active. When I type the character \, emacs complains with: after 0 kwd macro iterations: Wrong type argument: characterp, -1 Any idea of what is going on? Thanks, Juan Manuel -- You received this mes