On Dec 4, 2012 7:24 PM, "Paulo Sérgio Almeida" wrote:
> I have been looking into the PersistentVector implementation, and I came
up with a simple improvement relevant for small vectors, of between 33 and
64 elements. For these sizes I found an "assoc" loop to be between 29% and
39% faster and a "g
Hi all,
I have been looking into the PersistentVector implementation, and I came up
with a simple improvement relevant for small vectors, of between 33 and 64
elements. For these sizes I found an "assoc" loop to be between 29% and 39%
faster and a "get" loop between 4% and 8% faster. The memory
