On Dec 4, 2012 7:24 PM, "Paulo Sérgio Almeida" <pssalme...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have been looking into the PersistentVector implementation, and I came up with a simple improvement relevant for small vectors, of between 33 and 64 elements. For these sizes I found an "assoc" loop to be between 29% and 39% faster and a "get" loop between 4% and 8% faster. The memory consumption is also significantly better. For smaller or larger sizes everything stays the same.
Sounds cool, and a constant reduction x1000000 is still a reduction, right? > I am not sure what is the proper procedure for submitting patches. Shall I send it someone, put it somewhere? If you are willing, follow instructions on http://clojure.org/contributing. -- Stephen Compall If anyone in the MSA is online, you should watch this flythrough. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
