Did you try out test.generative? If so, how does simple check contrast to
test.generative?
On Thursday, November 21, 2013 11:31:19 AM UTC-8, Chas Emerick wrote:
>
> simple-check is planning on remaining Clojure-only, at least for the
> foreseeable future. This "non-fork fork" is the best altern
simple-check is planning on remaining Clojure-only, at least for the
foreseeable future. This "non-fork fork" is the best alternative Reid
and I could come up with to enable people to use it on both Clojure and
ClojureScript. Hopefully double-check will be unnecessary at some
point. :-)
- C
Reid Draper's simple-check[1] is a generative/property-based testing
library for Clojure that implements (and improves upon IMO) the
shrinking of failing test cases seen in e.g. quickcheck in the Haskell
and Erlang lands.
simple-check has totally changed how I do certain kinds of testing. From
Looks good!
I am wondering though, why not merging your work on the parent project
instead of creating a new one (with a new name etc), you seemed to be on
your way of doing just this?
On Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:38:16 PM UTC+1, Chas Emerick wrote:
>
> Reid Draper's simple-check[1] is a
